Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Liked It Better When The Winter and Summer Games Were In The Same Year.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 09:48 PM
Original message
I Liked It Better When The Winter and Summer Games Were In The Same Year.
Edited on Thu Jan-22-04 09:55 PM by arwalden
Every four years... instead of every two years alternating, as the are now.

The fact that we looked forward to and waited four WHOLE years for the Olympic games made them more special.

-- Allen

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whitacre D_WI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree, Allen.
BIG time.


Olympics, presidential elections... every fourth year was something SPECIAL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Financially I like it better that they're split
I love to attend the Games in person, whenever possible. Much too expensive to fork out twice within 6 months.

Damn, I'm still not sure about Athens and have to decide soon. Salt Lake City was such a 600 mile snap from my Las Vegas base.

My Olympic gripe is that ABC dropped out after 1984. CBS and especially NBC never covered the feature events or provided the same spectacular look-and-feel as McKay and ABC did. I could live until 3000 and still not forgive Bob Costas for dishing out baseball scores and analysis during his nightly shift from Seoul in '88.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I can hardly bear to watch them anymore..The coverage SUCKS
Just show me the damn sports.. Start at the beginning, and cover it to the end..

In the olden days, they did that.. Now they time delay everything, and show you a "Best of....." in teensy sound bytes with their inane commentary..

I used to love it when the olympics was on, because normally the stations went off air at around midnoght, but when the olympics was on, you could tune in at 2 am and see some Russian shotputter, or the swimming time trials..

They used to show EVERYTHING that they could.. I Actually liked seeing the 23rd place Pairs skaters' performances .. It made you really appreciate the "good ones" when they were on..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. NBC ruined its coverage with ratings-driven research
They decided women won't watch boxing, so the old Sugar Ray Leonard primetime coverage is kaput. Track and especially field took up too much time, so now they cop out with a 2-minute canned highlight package of the high jump, for example, instead of full live coverage.

I agree completely, it royally SUCKS. Especially compared to that of other countries. When I attended Barcelona and Sydney the local TV was FANTASTIC, a special channel(s) and live all day. Spanish TV in particular would show everything, even consolation (flight B) swimming races with the Spanish girl thrilled to have finished 6th but broken the national record.

Both of those years I had no idea how pathetic the coverage here had been, until my relatives and friends turned over VCR tapes and I reviewed them in disbelief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah and it was ridiculous... Women don't ROUTINELY watch
boxing, but boxing as an international amateur event is quite different from commercial boxing. My guess is that a lot more women would wathc than they realized. Didtto with many of the other "slower" events-- that are not commonly on tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I could not agree with you more, SoCalDem...
The coverage has largely spoiled the games for me. I still remember "cutesy" Paula Zahn's coverage when she was with CBC (puke) and then there was John Tesh! The latest to cover have largely escaped me, since I've been determined to ignore them...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SideshowScott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. On one hand I agree..The games were more spical then..But on the other..
We dont have to wiat four frikkin years for the games! I kinda enjoy seeing the games every four years..But then it does take some of the grandur out of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Me too!!!!!!!!!!!!
I want it back the way it was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Different situation here
Winter Games are completely alien to us. So we notice no difference.

Ice? What's ice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC