Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I watched "No Country For Old Men" last night...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:59 PM
Original message
I watched "No Country For Old Men" last night...
Anyone else seen it and what was your opinion? It seemed to be a lot like the old Rutger Hauer movie, The Hitcher. He could never escape from the guy. It seemed like a comment on the random violence in our society. The wrong place at the wrong time and being with the wrong people and you stand a good chance at ending up dead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
littlebit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought it was ok.
A little slow in some parts. And the violence was a Little over the top. But it was alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Amazing movie. About the best directed movie I've ever seen.
I think that the Coen Brothers did a great job of making every scene feel intense without having to use a lot of gimmicks to do it. The lack of music was downright haunting.

I didn't think I enjoyed it that much while I was watching it, but I woke up the next morning thinking about it. Really an excellent film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably the best movie of the past several years
absolutely fantastic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought it was a great movie even though I had to zone out at times
because it was so creepy. I woulnd't rent it again. Even though I missed parts as I zoned out. Too much torturous violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Tommy Lee Jones said it could be classified as a horror movie
due to the way Anton chigorn is portrayed as a cold, heartless killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought it was well done, but I would have liked to have read the book first.
It would have given it a lot better context and understanding to it.

I love the Coen brothers' work and this is no exception; that being said, their best movie still is Fargo and their most enjoyable movie is The Big Lebowski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was bizarre. That was one ruthless dude.
The ending of course threw me off. But it was appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I loved the gas station coin flipping scene
Anton is chilling.

I was always looking forward to his next scene.

The Academy Awards finally got it right at the top. No Country was better than "There will be Blood" Javier wasn't better than Daniel Day-Lewis, but still incredible, so they give Day-Lewis Best Actor and Javier best supporting actor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. When he strangled that young cop in the beginning, I knew he was one
rough dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's interesting that had the Josh Brolin character
not had a conscience and returned to help the dieing man asking for water then the events in the movie would not have played out, Josh would have gotten the money and no headache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well the tracking device was still in the breifcase though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. D'oh, for got about that!
If was smart, then he'd have tossed the original case and put the loot in a duffle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. for reasons i've gone into in other threads, i thought it was
pretentious and overbearing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. I thought it was a great movie
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 06:10 PM by CreekDog
A few thoughts:

1) this is the only movie I've seen where they let the desert look as washed out by sunlight on screen as it looks in real life. i'm a desert rat and i've noticed how midday photography that actually captures how the desert looks at midday appears overexposed; it's not. the movie lets it look like that, it looks more real, but it does look 'worse'. i wonder what the directors/producers' thinking was, because it's the kind of thing that would normally be 'corrected'. hmmm.

2) one of the dynamics in the movie (and apparently in the novel) was how the uber criminal used people following society's basic rules of friendliness and helpfulness against them and against others. in other words, he was more successful at his crimes because people cooperated, were polite, etc. etc.

3) meaning? that's a hard one for me. to me the good are always outmatched by the bad guys because their adherence to good makes them unequal to the task of vanquishing the bad guys and yet the ability to get past that restraint is precisely what makes the bad guys so bad. if the good guys did that, they probably wouldn't be good anymore and we wouldn't want them acting on our behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The only thing about #2 is...
Josh Brolin's character's immoral (some would say) behavior is what did him in.

It was a fascinating movie. I'm not sure what I think about it, but I think about it often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. IMHO I thought it was a good movie, not a great movie and the ending although like real life
left me totally unsatisfied.

I still cannot believe that this won Best Picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Terrific Movie

I even loved the ending (contrary to the way a number of my friends felt). Tommy Lee Jones just gets better and better.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yep...
You nailed it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC