Why are some sports sites obsessed with photo galleries now?
Fox sports is by far the worst. If I want to see how they're ranking NBA teams, I don't need to see a picture of Kobe Bryant to tell me the Lakers are 2nd. I don't need to see a picture of Kurt Warner to show they think the Cardinals are the worst playoff team remaining. What's wrong with a simple list? Don't they know that reading down a single page goes a lot quicker than having to click through 30 and waiting for each of the 30 pictures to load??
you shouldn't have to spend more than 10 minutes reading that stuff. Not to mention it makes hiding that you're reading sports at work difficult with a big ol' pic of the Trail Blazers splashed across the screen. :P
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.