Waitwaitwaitwaitwait... "porn for women" is not just trashy romance novels.

[redqueen]

I didn't agree to that!

I like real porn, and I know damn well I'm not the only woman who does.

[ceile]

1. No, you're not.

:hi:

[TZ]

2. Oh I know...

but I always heard romance novels or bodice rippers referred to as "porn for women". I've seen the real thing too. I like it, I must say.

[redqueen]

3. Cool...

This was supposed to be a reply to your thread, actually. :blush:

[TZ]

4. Thats okay

Between your threads and my threads its LADIES DAY in teh Lounge..:evilgrin:

[gratuitous]

5. A friend sent me several "porn for women" photos

Photos like this oiled-up beefcake hunk doing the unbelievable: vacuuming the living room.

Another tanned and toned hotbody . . . (wait for it) . . . doing the dishes.

She had to take a smoke break after looking at those pictures. And she doesn't even smoke!

[HarukaTheTrophyWife]

6. LostinVA and I are with you

[Deep13]

7. Here you go.

[redqueen]

8. And for you...

[mainegreen]

10. That tank is absurd. I love it.

[Deep13]

19. Well, that looks painful. nt

[flvegan]

9. How DARE you women exploit men like that!!!!1

Or women, depending on your preference.

:rofl:

:hide:

[TZ]

11. uh huh. Pot meet kettle....

:rofl:

[redqueen]

12. What? I didn't call it news did I?

Am I using it to sell toothpaste? Websites? Trucks? NO!

Exploit that, freeper.

[no name no slogan]

13. YEAH! HOW DARE YOU!

(and, uh, where I can I sign up to be, uh, exploited?)

[TZ]

14. I got yer exploitation right here babee!!!

:rofl:

[LeftyMom]

20. Speaking of which, my inbox is sadly empty of .jpgs

Drop trou and fix that, would ya?

[Yavin4]

15. "Porn for Women" Would Be A Great Name for A Band

Wouldn't it?

[redqueen]

16. Hmmm...

maybe. I think it'd work for an all-women band... but if it was guys that'd be kinda lame.

Unless they all looked the part, of course.

Yeah, we could use a male version of the pussycat dolls.

[Symarip]

17. Fucking News To Me

Details at 11.

[redqueen]

18. Hahah...

but still, no it isn't!