Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Food photo fail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:47 PM
Original message
Food photo fail
If you can stomach it, and can view the Flash on the homepage, witness some of the most unappetizing photos of food ever:
www.redbarnfood.com

Might have a better use a diet aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's pretty awful!
Food photography is a real art. I saw a program about it once and there's a whole bunch of tricks they use.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It should be about business, if the pictures are supposed to induce hunger, not vomiting...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good grief! Why don't they just quit being so cheap and spend the money on
professional photography? That travesty of a "food gallery" on their website isn't going to win over anybody. What's not blurry or over-exposed looks wilted, greasy and thoroughly unappetizing.

As a graphic designer, I always have to laugh at the people who think they're designers or photographers because they bought a Mac with Photoshop and a digital camera. Like that's all it takes. I could get into the cockpit of an airplane but that wouldn't make me a pilot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Couldn't agree more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Because the 'new economy' is about "value",
with "value" meaning only expense costs, not anything that really qualifies under the definition of "value":

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/value
(See definitions 1 and 3)

http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0412/p13s01-usec.html
One of many articles discussing "value", "new economy", "new normal", and the other Orwellian newspeak... :)

Anybody can get a camera and equipment.

Anyone can get workers, and call them better even if the quality isn't up to par with pig shit, claiming we have an overabundance of workers:
http://www.minyanville.com/articles/BKX-Bernanke-SRS-SGP-IYR-ISM/index/a/23205

Plenty of DUers think photography is just pointing the lens and just pressing the shutter-release button. (I used to respond with the nuances involved, like it matters.)

Some think using low-end, proprietary software makes them the king of the world in other fields too. (um, no...)



Of course, and in the end, ALL art is subjective. There are bound to be many who think those photos are the best compositions ever. Of course, some people like looking at open-heart surgery too...



And, what the heck, Seth MacFarlane, Matt Stone, and Trey Parker all lowered the bar on animation quality and look where they got to. Expect Comedy Central or FOX Broadcasting's next big hit to involve stick figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Before photography became digital it was easy to spend all day on
a single food shot for a national ad. I've art directed a lot of food photography -- it's a meticulous process. It's quicker today with digital cameras, and having retouching software like Photoshop allows us to cover up mistakes we'd ordinarily fix on set. But you still need an eye for design, lighting and food styling, plus the experience of having done it over and over again, to get good results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. that food looks like it has already been eaten
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, the fades between images is too fast, and re: the photos, are you sure they didn't
cut'n'paste open heart surgery and display the results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Some of those dishes actually didn't look all that bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Lobster never looked so unappetizing
Come on, its not that hard to make some of those dishes look fantastic. Steak Frites is one of my favorite meals, but not there. And the egg with truffle, I'm sure it's expensive but who would order it based on that photo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Take a look at their menu
they have "Appertizers" including Salmon "Tartar"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Even worse, the "chef" is a French Culinary Institute grad with two years at Le Cirque
Seriously, not only is the food photographed in a most shitty way, it's not even plated or presented well. The lettuce looks awful on a lot of it. Probably due to a nincompoop taking the photos taking too long and forcing the lettuce into wilt-zone, but still.

That food looks awful, and I don't mean the photography.

And whey does the chef still keep his DDS credential after his name? He's not a practicing dentist any more, and having a DDS has nothing to do with being a chef. Drop the degree, shithead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's way too close up
Is that a human tongue in one of the photos? They breeze by so fast I can't tell. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC