Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, they can wire the guy's brain into a 10-foot tall smurf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:48 PM
Original message
So, they can wire the guy's brain into a 10-foot tall smurf
but they can't just fix his legs for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. He goes down with the ship at the end of the movie.
Stupid CGI ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllenVanAllen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. You and your troublesome logic.



Let me have my big-ass smurfs in peace why don't cha'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, since corporations still control America in the future and RW dicks
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 07:18 PM by Lorien
are still in charge, in shouldn't surprise you that there is plenty of money to develop avatars, but none to help paraplegics walk because of those darling STEM CELLS.

(Note: the bad guy in the film promises that he'll restore the Marines working legs IF he helps him with the corporation's mission, so obviously we don't have Universal Health care 100 years from now either).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL! Damn! I was thinking that same thing when I was reading the reviews
they can create a whole new alien body but they can't fix the guy's legs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They can, but there's no universal health care in the future
didn't you see the trailer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. or according to Star Trek no cure for male pattern baldness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
45. Exactly. The sarge even offers to pay to have them fixed.
Just like now, in the future, only those who can afford it are deemed worthy of healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Unobtainium? Really? That's the dumbest name for an element, ever.
The first time I heard it, I thought "They couldn't possibly give it such a stupid name, could they? I must have misheard the dialogue."

Nope. Unobtainium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They didn't invent it
It's a whimsical aerospace engineering (among other things) term for anything that's either very rare or a huge pain to make. The ship in The Core was made of unobtainium. It also applies to theoretical materials that can't actually exist.

Still weak, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well, I learned something new today. Thanks!
It would be nice if they at least explained their use of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Perhaps, "mcguffinium" would have worked instead. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. They can, but it cost more money than he could afford on a grunt's salary
That was part of the first ten minutes of narration. That was part of how the general roped him into spying on the Navi; he promised that the corporation would front the cost of his spinal cord operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. So we've got interstellar travel, but medical care is still a pipe dream?
Bodes ill for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think it was pretty obvious that the future portrayed in the film is not a positive one
Wars of conquest and greed continued on an interstellar scale, and humanity had essentially destroyed Earth in its rapacious need for more money. Why would such a society give someone a pricy medical operation for free?

It makes perfect sense within the context of the film, so I'm not sure why you're trying so hard to poke a hole in this particular plot point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Only because it's the most obvious, and because the movie makes a point of foregrounding it
Have patience--I'll get around to the others in due course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. actually, the movie makes a point of explaining both aspects...
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 02:23 AM by dysfunctional press
first off- the 10-foot smurf wasn't 'wired' for him...
second- they could fix his legs- if he could afford it(apparently he didn't qualify for subsidies)...they even dangle a new pair of legs in front of him like a carrot on a stick(the effect is best viewed in 3d).

did you not see the movie- or just not pay attention...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Shouldn't you be smooching True Lies?
So the smurf-wiring is a macguffin. And the expensive medical procedure is a macguffin.

Got it.


Gosh. I'm sure I remember playing this video game before...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. typical.
your obvious envy of james cameron's career successes comes across very clearly from the tenor of your posts.

it's kinda cute, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's close to the craziest thing I've ever seen posted on DU
And I'm a baritone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. of course it is...and of course you are...
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 02:20 PM by dysfunctional press
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

don't feel bad- MOST people can't do what james cameron does- it doesn't make you any less of a person that you can't come close to matching his career accomplishments...to date. :shrug:

btw- did you design and render your DU avatar image all by yourself??? it sure seems like oscar-caliber graphic design work...:snicker:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. So...
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 03:24 PM by Orrex
Because I think that Cameron is a schlocky director--and that his current offering is more or less indistinguishable from a video game--this means that I must somehow be jealous of him? What crazy CGI planet are you from, anyway? Off the top of my head I can think of three of his films that are unwatchably bad. Whatever his accomplishments, he's also capable of really terrible film-making.

btw- did you design and render your DU avatar image all by yourself??? it sure seems like oscar-caliber graphic design work...:snicker:

Gosh, that's a zinger. What time is recess over? Give me Cameron's budget and creative control, and I'll put together an avatar worthy of the most pandering Happy Meal toy you've ever seen, just like Jimmy has done.

And did you stuff your head up your ass all by yourself? That's some USGS-caliber spelunking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Its a half CGI half live action planet with lame CGI characters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. But the CGI creatures are almost twice as tall as non-smurfs
So it kind of evens out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. So far I've only seen clips and trailers
But is it me or does Gollum seem more real than those 10 foot tall Smurfs? Maybe they should have gotten Peter Jackson to make this movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Tony the Tiger seems more real than those 10 foot tall smurfs.
And he's GRRRRRR-EAT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zerox Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. The CGI in Avatar was done by Jackson's company, WETA.
The trailers do not do this film justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. so...what format did you see the entire film in...?
2d, 3d, or 3d-imax?

considering how much you trash you like to talk about avatar- i have to assume that you've seen the entire film...otherwise your posts would reek of incessant & ignorant jealousy of cameron's success- and you claim that isn't it- so you must be making an informed judgement after seeing the film in it's entirety, and i'm just curious as to which format you saw it in. i saw it in 3d-imax, and it's NOTHING like the movie you describe, so i have to believe that perhaps you viewed it in a 'lesser' format, or at a sub-standard theatre. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Where the hell are you getting that bullshit about jealousy?
Am I only permitted to mock things of which I'm jealous? How the hell does that figure?

Tell you what. Send me $40 to offset the cost of seeing it in Supercolossal Realer-than-Real IMAX, if it's that important to you.

Until then, I'll be happy to complain about the glimpses that Jimmy himself has given us re: the horrible previews that he greenlighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. incessant & ignorant jealousy it is then....pretty much what i figured.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 04:52 PM by dysfunctional press
$40 for an imax movie?

the people at the box office must know you all too well, and be able to see you coming...:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Well, let's see
$10 for the ticket, gas for the 90 mile round trip, parking, refreshments, etc. I am happy to accept PayPal, for your convenience.

For the life of me, I can't see how you come up with jealousy as the source of my derision. Am I also jealous of Carlos Mencia for that same reason?


I mean, gee. I suppose it's cool that you get a special feeling form 10-foot-tall smurfs, but why do you have to take it out on everybody else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. you simply protest too much about something you admit knowing next to nothing about...
so there must be some underlying reason...

"Give me Cameron's budget and creative control, and I'll put together an avatar worthy of the most pandering Happy Meal toy you've ever seen, just like Jimmy has done."

yep...jealousy, plain and simple. the green-eyed monster strikes again...

don't feel bad though- you're only human.

but then- so is cameron. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I've been reading back through your posts to find the one that makes sense.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 05:14 PM by Orrex
The search continues.


"Give me Cameron's budget and creative control, and I'll put together an avatar worthy of the most pandering Happy Meal toy you've ever seen, just like Jimmy has done."

yep...jealousy, plain and simple. the green-eyed monster strikes again...

Well, in fairness, I was responding to your nonsensical and pointlessly petty attack on my avatar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. you don't have to back-pedal on my account.
i didn't say that there was anything wrong with your jealousy of someone more talented.

it's perfectly natural, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. But you're assuming your (ridiculous) conclusion
My derision isn't motivated by jealousy at all. Every point that you've tried to make based on that assumption is therefore baseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. then it must be...love.
you. LOVE. him.



thanks for the clarification- that would explain your obsessive behaviour in regard to his movies and his career.

it's even kind of...cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. It's a test.
To determine what ridiculous lengths Cameron's acolytes will go to in defending their icon.

So far, there appears to be no limit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. which is naturally why you've started at least three threads about him so far today...
you're behaving like a 3rd grader with his first crush on a girl...:loveya:

i was wrong- it's not cute.

it's ADORABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. You get weirder and weirder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. hey- i know the feeling...but 'you' don't have to explain your man-crush to me...
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 03:54 PM by dysfunctional press
everyone gets a little weird now and then.

(especially when you they can't have what you they obviously want so badly. )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Oooooh, snap! You win the smackdown of the thread award.
To you sir, 5 internets. And for the record, his Cameron crush is kinda sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. You're just jealous that Cameron likes me more.
And he doesn't even return DP's phonecalls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Eh, I had Cameron in the early 90s.
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 AM by EOTE
That was when he was at his prime. Couldn't get him to stop calling afterward, I had to change my number. You're just getting my sloppy seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. New eyes for Geordi...
...but nothing we can do about that baldness. Sorry, loser!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe he *wants* to be bald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Cause bald guys are hawt.
and don't you think Capt. Picard didn't know that, either. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. Don't look at me - I was stuck inside still figuring out the logic of "The Day After Tomorrow"
I thought it was a good film to watch in light of the fact that I was trapped inside my house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. I saw it last night in 3-D and loved it! I'm planning to see it again.
Too each his or her own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. "To each his or her own"
Apparently not. According to some, if you don't like the film, then you're suffering from pathological jealousy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. You do seem obsessed with James Cameron.
For days now. Maybe you shouldn't go to the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #35
48. *snort* A film you admit to not seeing.
Yeah, if you claim to not like a film that you haven't seen and then start multiple threads about it, that pretty much smacks of jealousy of some sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
46. Did you actually see the movie? Or did you just want to bitch? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC