Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's radioactive material in smoke alarms.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:03 PM
Original message
There's radioactive material in smoke alarms.
I didn't realize this until the other day when I came across a very old smoke alarm. It had a radioactive symbol on it. I looked it up and smoke alarms use Americium for the detection.

From the EPA:

How much radiation is in smoke detectors?
The radiation source in an ionization chamber detector is a very small disc, about 3 to 5 millimeters in diameter, weighing about 0.5 gram. It is a composite of americium-241 in a gold matrix. The average activity in a smoke detector source is about one microcurie, 1 millionth of a curie.

Americium emits alpha particles and low energy gamma rays. It has a half-life of about 432 years. The long half-life means that americium decays very slowly, emitting very little radiation. At the end of the 10 year useful life of the smoke detector, it retains essentially all its original activity.

How much radiation exposure will I get from a smoke detector?

As long as the radiation source stays in the detector, exposures would be negligible (less than about 1/100 of a millirem per year), since alpha particles cannot travel very far or penetrate even a single sheet of paper, and the gamma rays emitted by americium are relatively weak. If the source were removed, it would be very easy for a small child to swallow, but even then exposures would be very low because the source would pass through the body fairly rapidly (by contrast, the same amount of americium in a loose powdered form would give a significant dose if swallowed or inhaled). Still, its not a good idea to separate the source from the detector apparatus.

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/sources/smoke_alarm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Years ago there was an article in Readers Digest about a young man...
Who collected a large quantity of it in an attempt to build some sort of nuclear reactor. Suffice to say all he ended up doing was exposing himself to radiation and got in a lot of trouble when the police found his nuclear device (duct taped closed toolbox).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same topic but from Harper's
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 01:00 PM by AngryAmish


Last I heard he was rearrested for his radioactive antics and was suffering from radiation poisoning.

this is his pic

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Mental illness sucks.
:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some, not all smoke alarms
The more sensitive Ionization Detectors have Americium. However the Photo-Detectors do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC