Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All of the SNL movies suck so terribly, except the Blues Brothers. What was the secret?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:31 PM
Original message
All of the SNL movies suck so terribly, except the Blues Brothers. What was the secret?
How did they make the movie so good? Why did the Blues Brothers' sequel suck so badly? Why do all the other SNL characters turn to total shit on the big screen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DerekG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the first Wayne's World was hilarious
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think Wayne's World sucks...
...can't touch the Blues Brothers. But it stands above all the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, you're right. Wayne's world is pretty good. It's not nearly as good as Blues Brothers but...
it is pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Wayne's World! Party time! Excellent!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Christmas Vacation is great. It was full of SNL people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Christmas Vacations sucks ass. Vacation and European Vacation were awesome.
Also, the Griswalds were never SNL characters, which is the defining characteristic of an SNL movie.

It's Pat
The Ladies' Man
Stuart Saves His Family

Those are SNL movies.

Black Sheep
Deuce Bigelow
Happy Gilmore

These are movies that involve people from SNL but are not SNL movies. They may or may not suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Tommy Boy - SNL people, not an SNL movie, and didn't suck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. I loved Christmas Vacation. I beg to differ.
When we put up lights we call it doing a Griswold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. My husband and I have both been in the Christmas bonus
situation before - not knowing how much - or even if - the annual Christmas bonus would appear - and when. Some years - it was a lot of money - and in time for Christmas shopping. And some years it literally showed up as a automatic bank transfer on Christmas Eve. And then a few years ago, it disappeared - without advanced notice. So - that part of the drama really hits home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I wouldn't define it as an SNL movie just like I wouldn't define "Animal House" as one
SNL movies are movies based on skits you'd find on SNL. Christmas Vacation, Animal House, Caddyshack - those movies had a slew of SNL cast members in it but they weren't based on any SNL skit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Actually wouldn't being National Lampoon movies preclude both Animal House and Vacation...
movies from being SNL movies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. That's true too. But I had mentioned Caddyshack and that is not a National Lampoon movie
just a vehicle for some SNL stars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. But Lampoon alumnus Doug Kenney was one of the writers
of Caddyshack IIRC. There was a lot of interplay between the Lampoon in its glory days and the first incarnation of SNL. A number of future SNLers turned up on the Lampoon LP "Lemmings."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. To be fair, that was a National Lampoon movie.
Along with Animal House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. I liked Coneheads. But yes, in comparison to the Blues Brothers, many many films
should not have ever even been made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Belushi was an exceptional talent and the cast member best suited for movies
There were several other factors:

By design, most SNL sketches are things that are somewhat amusing for a few minutes. The musical nature of the Blues Brothers bit allowed them to expand it.

The studio was willing to spend shitloads of money on it because after Animal House they knew they would make it back.

They had access to a group of great guest stars who needed the money due to the decline of interest in blues and soul music in the early 70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It still doesn't work on paper.
We have 2 SNL characters, so let's compensate for the fact that such characters wear thin quickly by grafting the story onto a form that has been unpopular for about a decade: the musical. In fact, not just the musical but the musical in the classic format of "a movie about people trying to put on a musical show" (see Bing Crosby in White Christmas for the pinnacle of the genre and a huge portion of the movies made from 1935-1945)

Maybe it's that they added those old forms with smokey and the bandit type driving.

Still a puzzler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. The music.
Most of the SNL movies are the extended, exaggerated shtick of a slim premise. It becomes hollow, unfunny and unauthentic.

They couldn't do that to the music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Outside of the Blues Brothers and Waynes World...
Most SNL skits don't have the depth for a backstory. The backstory becomes the movie.

Can you imagine a movie made out of the Whiners? How about Operaman? How about Stuart Smalley? Oh wait, you don't have to imagine that last one, we have empirical evidence of its suckage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Stuart Smalley's book was good but the movie failed to do it justice
If you are familiar with Garrison Keillor's Lake Wobegone you can get the impression that this is what happened to some of the families when they moved into the city and developed undiagnosed cases of depression. Of course this is Minnesotan/Scandihoovian type humor which Franken understands quite well, but is generally not quite grasped by a) national movie audiences and perhaps more importanly b) Hollywood, who would benefit from understanding what they're dealing with before trying to present it to the general public. Anyway, the backstory worked quite well but it probably should have been directed by the Coen brothers (they an Franken grew up in Minneapolis and would all understand what they're dealing with) instead of Harold Ramis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OriginalGeek Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. No doubt Stuart made for a bad movie
but I would still love to have Al Franken as one of my senators or congressman or even President some day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Totally disagree about the Stuart Smalley movie!
Several of my co-workers watched it around the same time after I'd seen it. And we found it so funny we've kept repeating lines over the years. "Daddy shot Donnie" Daddy shot Donnie". And - "I wouldn't normally say this, but do you think you can get yourself to a pound cake?" One co-worker actually had a real life experience with relatives in a fist fight at his grandfather's funeral. And Stuart's sister is so close to my sister - it's scary. And don't forget "That was not a quality ham." OK. OK. It's an acquired taste - but for those of us who like it - we really like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. There's one other really great SNL movie, it barely makes the criteria but it is - Bob Roberts
A movie based on an SNL sketch defines a SNL movie.

Tim Robbin's "Bob Roberts" started out as a SNL sketch so technically it is an SNL movie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Saturday_Night_Live_films


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Roberts
The film is Robbins' directorial debut, and is based on a short segment of the same name and featuring the same character that Robbins did for Saturday Night Live on December 13, 1986. This is also the movie debut of Jack Black.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Interesting. But as a mocumentary it kind of lacks the "just like you saw on TV" thing that most...
SNL movies have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Have you seen
Opportunity Knocks with Dana Carvey? It's from the early '90s. I'm not much for comedies, usually they are too formulaic and contrived but that one was well done. There is one scene in there that was so funny and unexpected, I never laughed so hard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's not an SNL movie, just a movie with someone who was in SNL
SNL movies are based on skits from SNL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. OK
thanks for setting me straight. Forgot about that distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Mike Myers films were great... until the "love guru".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Other than Wayne's World, none of the movies were SNL movies.
Although he came perilously close to making a Sproket's movie. That got preempted by an Austin Powers sequel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savalez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. Don't forget Tommy Boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. Not SNL movie. Tommy was not an SNL character
Edited on Sun Oct-09-11 05:45 AM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. I couldn't stop laughing through "Happy Gilmore."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Define "SNL movie".
Most of the non-sucking options here feature SNL alums but are not based on SNL skits. The exception is (the original) "Wayne's World".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. The thread contains the definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Blues Brothers movie was good?
I finally watched it for the first time last weekend. I give it 2 out of 5 stars. Except for the music, I was totally unimpressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. I liked Superstar
quite a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. If you limit it to movies based on SNL sketch
"Coneheads" is underrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. Cab Calloway.
End of story.

:smoke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. The main reason is very simple
SNL has sucked, badly, since the second cast disbanded. The actors haven't been good nor have the sketches, with very, very few exceptions like "Wayne's World."

You can't make a quality movie out of a bad three-minute sketch, and that's what they're trying to do. I mean, come on: It's Pat? A sketch that revolves around trying to figure out what gender Pat is? That's something you do once to wedge between a sauerkraut commercial and the "featured musical guest," not make into either a running series or a feature-length film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cemaphonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. The '87-91(ish) cast was pretty awesome too, although the writing wasn't as good.
I think it's that it wasn't really a SNL movie, in the sense that that it wasn't written/produced by the SNL people. Also, instead of having to build a movie around some "wacky" gimmick, The Blues Brothers were just a pair of brothers. Who played the Blues. So you could really build any kind of plot around that.

Throw in some great musical numbers, Belushi's natural talent, and some hilariously over-the-top car chases, and you're golden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. Most of the SNL movies were based on skits that sucked.
Make a movie out of a skit that sucked and you have a movie that sucks. The two exceptions being Wayne's World and Blues Brothers - although I never thought that the Blues Brothers was very funny.

Those 2 movies didn't rely on just one joke. Also, I think that having 2 main characters - with distinctive personalities - helps. The movie then doesn't rely on just one person being funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. So if we use Toonces the driving cat to do a remake of Le Mans it won't be good?
I don't believe you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. How you took what I said and came to that conclusion
is an absolute mystery to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
41. The secret is that "The Blues Brothers" ....
sucked as bad, or worse, than any of them, even "The Coneheads," but everyone was so stoned back then that we never noticed how bad they were.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. (oops)
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 04:27 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
45. It was fun to see Chicago as a main character in a film.
As a Chicagoan I gotta say that is what made the movie for me. There had not been any major films for decades shot in Chicago because the elder mayor Daley was upset about the TV show
"M Sqaud" which was filmed in Chicago having an episode about police bribery. The music was great, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
46. Would Ghostbusters qualify? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
48. The exceptional music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
49. I LOVE LOVE LOVE The Ladies Man. But I hate SNL. Too right wing. nt
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 05:28 PM by valerief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. 1974 Dodge Monaco sedan
In describing the car to his brother, Jake, Elwood said, "It's got a cop motor, a 440-cubic-inch plant. It's got cop tires, cop suspension, cop shocks. It's a model made before catalytic converters so it'll run good on regular gas."

Elwood: It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. they were on a mission from God
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC