Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would You Consider The Very Early Years of the Beatles Their Punk Rock Years?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 04:54 PM
Original message
Would You Consider The Very Early Years of the Beatles Their Punk Rock Years?
Their Teddy Boy years?



I'm not a music afficianado, but I think that their early concerts in Germany could be considered punk.

Now, I'm not saying that it was exactly the same style of punk like the Sex Pistols, and I may be dead wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Beatles has musical talent, ergo, they weren't punk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. They had to play 8 hours a night to drunks and strippers
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 05:18 PM by Maccagirl
I would guess it was an anything goes atmosphere. I read where George Harrison thought it was their peak as far as live performances.

On edit: I love that picture. Astrid was a true artist with the camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Listen to Helter Skelter loud, through headphones.
Screaming and out of tune guitars...that's pretty proto-punk right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Think about going from "She Loves You, Ya, Ya, Ya" to "Helter Skelter".
That progression blows my fucking mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. The difference between The Beatles and pretty much the rest...
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 09:19 AM by Amerigo Vespucci
...is that they could do a song like "Helter Skelter" once, and then move on to new territory.

There is only ONE song in their ENTIRE CATALOG that sounds like "Helter Skelter," and that song is "Helter Skelter." No retreads, no double-dipping.

43 years later...FORTY THREE...that song STILL comes screaming out of the gate, and it's never been equaled.

There's never been another "I Am The Walrus."

There's never been another "And Your Bird Can Sing."

They hit that fucking opening chord on "A Hard Day's Night" and EVERY OTHER BAND IN THE WORLD wanted to do it too but realized they'd be doing the "Beatles Hard Day's Night" thing if they did, so they had to let it lay.

They just wrote their own rules as they went along. They had George Martin in their posse, so there was one "establishment" figure that acted as the glue that held all of the wild-ass threads together, but they just made new shit happen every time they stepped into a studio.

They also kicked Mick & Keef's arse throughout their career. I have to wonder if the Stones would have been motivated to make albums like "Sticky Fingers" and "Exile on Main Street" if there hadn't been the ongoing friendly games of one-upsmanship between the bands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The only musician that could play the "top this" game with
the Beatles was Brian Wilson. McCartney has said as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Their early music
would be more honestly described as "Boy-Band".

"I Want to Hold Your Hand" is *not* punk.

Extremely talented, but punk would not have gotten air time in CA-1964 America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. By Early, I Am Referring to their Hambourg, Germany Years
Not their boy band years which followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'll concede.
Only vaguely familiar with their work in Germany but seem to recall it was noted for being more strident and socially-motivated.

Thanks for the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm Not Saying That They Were What We Now Consider Punk
Now, my limited definition of Punk was stripped down, loud, fast, garage band, go nuts kind of music, and in those Hambourg, Germany days, they were doing just that. They were playing 6-8 hours a night, five nights a week. They were playing to really rough house crowds. Hambourg was, at the time, the most sinful city in the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. From my scant knowledge
and faulty middle-age recollections of those times I believe your assessment is spot-on.

My original comment was based on my recollection as a uninformed teen. I liked their American music but found it to be somewhat commercial compared to groups like The Animals.

Memory of later readings on their early work has surfaced and, though I'm not familiar with the sound, I can confirm your report.


Thanks for the trip down Angst Lane!



:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. They looked more like Rockers than Teds
in those days. The music was definitely not punk. They covered pop standards as well as American rock 'n' roll/rockabilly tunes back in the Hamburg days. You had to be pretty flexible about what you played when you were doing 6 to 8 hour sets five nights a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC