Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it good that Pawlenty stays out of the Metro Transit strike?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 05:56 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is it good that Pawlenty stays out of the Metro Transit strike?
http://www.citypages.com/databank/25/1218/article12020.asp

Of course, if he got involved, he'd be more likely to side with the company than the people anyway... x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. not a big secret that he wants to destroy public transportation
He's going to let this strike run for as long as he can.
Pawlenty: "Poor people? Fuck 'em, they don't vote for me anyways."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Quite... it's bizarroworld...
If the bus strike affected his wealthy buddies, we'd be assured that he'd go in with guns blazing - on the side of the corporation though, the workers be spat on for all he cares.

Which leads to a bigger tragedy, how will the drivers be treated when this strike ends?

Worst of all, Pawlenty would rather cut social services and make many people suffer while building multiple expensive stadiums for a remarkable small amount of people (2) who could afford to build 10 times as many on their own, not forgetting that the high cost the sports teams wants prohibits many Americans from watching the so-called "American pastimes" at the stadium that they want built... it's bizarroworld, to say the least...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ye gods! *Another* transit strike?!
Edited on Tue Apr-06-04 07:09 PM by KamaAina
You do realize that that's (at least) the third one in the country since last fall. Ours in Sept. nearly cost me my job; the last day they were out was the day my ride came in to clean out his stuff (he'd been laid off). Shortly thereafter, LA went out for about a month; it was pretty much overshadowed by the grocery strike. After all, even first-class citizens whose lives actually matter shop at Vons. </sarcasm> And now this.

Meanwhile, back East, both New York and Boston are considering shutting down major commuter rail terminals during the political conventions this summer, both of which, if you can believe it, are being held right above the train stations. Sounds like Homer Simpson has left the nuke plant and taken a nice cushy job with Tom Ridge. :-)

Message: Transit doesn't matter. You are what you drive. Oh, you don't drive, because you're too poor or too disabled? Tough noogies. Where do you have to go that's so important anyway? </sarcasm> Never mind that the big-box Sprawl-Marts have forced many neighborhood businesses to close, leaving people with no shopping where they live.

Imagine if tolltakers went out and effectively shut down (say) the New York State Thruway. How long before someone would intervene then? Who, even the most bedrock fascist Repuke, would dare say "We don't care how long those greedy tolltakers stay out? We'll just let the highway stay closed as long as it takes."?

Edit: Can't speak for LA, but the Honolulu strike forced a number of small business to close in Chinatown, where many of the customers are transit-dependent. Apparently the powers-that-be want to bust unions so badly they don't even care about the small business owners who support them so fervently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's not staying out of it - has said he is 100% behind management
so he is no longer a neutral party - one who could intervene and affect a mediation. Makes life easier for him, though, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not surprised that he supports the management...
He's definitely two-faced.

I wonder how many people who voted for him still like him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC