Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: ES&S Official Says "Touchscreens Easiliy MANIPULATED!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU
 
the ether Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-04 07:47 PM
Original message
BBV: ES&S Official Says "Touchscreens Easiliy MANIPULATED!"

BBV: ES&S Official Says "Touchscreens Easiliy MANIPULATED!"


Tell this to every election official you know!




Election commission hears last pitch on vote machines
By Richard Duke

Courier Staff

The Saline County Election Commission, faced with having to revamp the county voting system by 2005, listened to the final presentation by independent companies about new and technologically advanced voting machines.

Representatives from Election Systems & Software spoke to officials Thursday morning, highlighting a feature that will assist the visually impaired with marking their ballots. Each county will have to provide assistance of this kind in the future.

The demonstration featured a terminal with a touch screen pad and an audible ballot that can be heard through headphones. The process marks the ballot, but it does not count it. The ballot can then be taken to a ballot box.

Mike Devereaux, who gave the presentation, said that touch screens, which many once thought would be the wave of the future, will never replace a paper ballot. The technology of touch screens, however, can greatly help those needing assistance in marking their ballot.

"The problem with touch screens as vote counters is that they can be easily manipulated," Devereaux said. "If someone were to go to a polling place that had a large turnout for John Kerry, that person could vote for John Kerry falsely, and when they got their receipt for John Kerry, they could report to an official that their vote was counted wrong. The entire machine would then have to be shut down with all of those votes still inside."


http://www.bentoncourier.com/articles/2004/06/25/news/46tnews.txt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SophieZ Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah well.
The problem with paperless electronic voting machines is not so much that one voter will mess with them. It's that when they put them in statewide, one hacker or one insider can change the votes of the entire state, and sneak off undetected.

THAT is the problem, and the Big Four vendors refuse to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Activist HQ Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC