Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC:The bounce that wasn't a bounce okay a slight bounce but wait...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 07:55 AM
Original message
ABC:The bounce that wasn't a bounce okay a slight bounce but wait...
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 07:56 AM by underpants
it was a bounce.

ABC WNT tonight (hosted by the ex-former Mrs. Michael Douglas Elizabeth Vargas) lead off this story with ~"there was no bounce" then within two minutes announced that there was a bounce (4-6 %). This was of course in contrast to the oft quoted (by the RW and sympathizers) WaPo/ABC poll from before the conventions that was so off the charts from any other poll it rendered itself meaningless a fact which is backed up by this new poll.

They make sure that the differences in responses from "likely voters" and "registered voters" are noted but see the link below and the tables showing the MASSIVE gains (compared to the pre-convention poll) made by Kerry..........which isn't a bounce so stop saying that.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/Vote2004/kerry_bounce_poll_040802.html

Aug 2, 2004— John Kerry took a tepid bump in support out of his nominating convention, gaining an advantage over President Bush among registered voters — but not so among those most likely to vote.

The Massachusetts senator gained five to eight points among registered voters on issues and attributes alike, while Bush lost about as many. And after a convention that focused heavily on his military experience in Vietnam, Kerry leads Bush as "better qualified to be commander-in-chief," by 52 percent to 44 percent.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. "which isn't a bounce so stop saying that"
*SNORT*

OK, Bob! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. When Bush's numbers.....................
remain the same or decline after the RNC I wonder if it'll receive the same amount of coverage? Doubtful, I'm sure there will be another "terra" warning or some other "breaking" story that will take the nation's mind off the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or they'll report a 2% rise in one poll as a "HUGE BOUNCE"
and they'll be sure to mention it's because the race was already so tight, that there are so few undecideds, etc., etc.

There is no limit to media whoredom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Will this same paragraph be in the postRNC convention story?
That net shift of eight points is about half the average, 15 points, for challengers running against incumbents in elections since 1968 (ranging from +30 for Bill Clinton in 1992 to -3 for George McGovern in 1972). The average bounce for all candidates is 12 points.

And notice that no mention is made of W's 13 point bounce in 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC