Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tribune Company owner Sam Zell: The L.A. Times's Human Wrecking Ball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:38 PM
Original message
Tribune Company owner Sam Zell: The L.A. Times's Human Wrecking Ball
WP: The L.A. Times's Human Wrecking Ball
By Harold Meyerson
Wednesday, June 11, 2008

....(Sam) Zell, for those of you fortunate enough not to follow news of the newspaper business, is the Chicago real estate magnate who last year purchased the Tribune Co., which owns the Times, the Chicago Tribune and a number of smaller papers. At the rate he's going, he's well on his way to...destroying the L.A. Times.

In his brief tenure atop the Trib empire, Zell has concluded that the proper response to the very real troubles in which the newspaper industry finds itself is to cut back on what newspapers offer....

During his first year in journalism, Zell has visited the city rooms and Washington bureaus of a number of Trib publications to deliver obscenity-laced warnings and threats to employees that whatever it was they were doing, it wasn't working. There was too much coverage of world and national affairs, he told Times writers and editors; readers don't want that stuff. Last week, the company decreed that its 12 papers would have to cut by 500 the number of pages they devoted every week to news, features and editorials, until the ratio of pages devoted to copy and pages devoted to advertising was a nice, even 1 to 1. At the Times, that would mean eliminating 82 pages a week.

As the company prepares to shed more reporters, it has measured writers' performances by the number of column inches of stories they ground out. It found, said one Zell executive, that the level of pages per reporter at one of Zell's smaller papers, the Hartford Courant (about 300), greatly exceeded that at the Times (about 50). As one of the handful of major national papers, however, the Times employs the kind of investigative and expert beat reporters not found at most smaller papers. I could name a number of Times writers who labored for months on stories that went on to win Pulitzers and other prizes, and whose column-inch production, accordingly, was relatively light. Doing so, I fear, would only put their necks on Zell's chopping block. So let me instead note that if The Post's Dana Priest and Anne Hull, who spent months uncovering the scandalous conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and whose reporting not only won a Pulitzer but caused a shake-up in the Army's treatment of wounded veterans, had been subjected to the Zellometer productivity index, they'd be prime candidates for termination.

Which is precisely, unfortunately, what's been happening at the Times. Voluntarily or not, large numbers of highly talented editors and reporters have left. The editorial staff is about two-thirds its size in the late 1990s, with further deep cuts in the offing. A paper that is both an axiom and an ornament of Los Angeles life, that helps set the political, business and artistic agenda for one of America's two great world metropolises, is being shrunk and, if Zell continues to get his way, dumbed down.

It's Zell's money, some would argue -- only, it's not. Of the $8.2 billion he used to take the paper private last year, Zell put up $315 million of his own money and used the employee stock ownership plan (without the consent of any employees, of course) to finance the rest....

Great newspapers take decades to build. We are discovering that they can be dismantled in relatively short order. The Los Angeles Times was a hyperpartisan, parochial broadsheet until Otis Chandler became its publisher in 1960 and began the work of transforming it into the paper of both record and insight that it's been for the past half-century. The diminution of such a paper diminishes its city, which is why L.A.'s otherwise disparate civic elites have periodically tried to restore the Times to local control since the Trib bought it at the turn of this century. Instead, in Zell, what Los Angeles has is a visiting Visigoth, whose civic influence is about as positive as that of the Crips, the Bloods and the Mexican mafia....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/10/AR2008061002529.html?nav%3Dmost_emailed&sub=AR
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meyerson nailed it.
Astonishing how quickly a newspaper can be destroyed by a megalomaniac like Zell.

Meanwhile, the NYT gets better, is available daily in LA, and the LA Daily News is adequate for local news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. My daily copy of the LAT has gotten smaller and smaller. I'd forgotten about Zell...
My own local paper, the Santa Barbara News-Press, has been destroyed by the outsize ego and shriveled heart of Wendy McCaw, another billionaire who came into the community from elsewhere. I have been counting on the LA Times to tell me what's going on in the state and the world, even if my ability to get local news is truncated.

This really is a crime. A heinous crime.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The continuing gossip is that David Geffen continues to have interest in buying the LAT. The last...
gossip I heard was that he and Zell have not settled on a price. I don't know if this will eventually happen or not. Although Geffen is not a newspaperperson either, he would at least return the paper to local control, and his politics are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'll keep my fingers crossed for that outcome then
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 04:47 PM by Hekate
Strangely enough we Santa Barbarians had hoped that Wendy's purchase would mean a return to "local control," but she (like Michael Huffington before her, when he ran for Congress) wasn't really from here and knew less than nothing about the job she had signed on for. Worse than Huffington, Wendy also has no idea about how to let go when something is a resounding failure. At least Michael and Arianna Huffington went away and each pursued other interests. We all wish Wendy would, but I don't think anyone here wants to pony up the kind of cash it would take to buy the News Press back from her.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for this info, Hekate. I remember some of the history of that situation...
but hadn't had an update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC