Arthur G. Burgoyne wrote his "The Homestead Strike of 1892" in 1893. He had been a local reporter and tried to be even-handed (Given that the majority of people of the Pittsburgh area supported the Strikers and the Strikers tried to stay within the law while Frick owned the law, Burgoyne was and is accused of being pro-union, he was NOT, it is simply the fact that the Union had the better moral argument at the time and Burgoyne pointed that out). I tried to find it on-line for the copy write should be expired, but all I found was places to buy the book including Amazon.com, not the book itself. I check Project Gutenberg for the book the book is NOT listed.
As to the books itself, it is the best book on Homestead I have read. It suffers from several disadvantages, first since the existence of Carnegie's second telegram did not come out till years later Burgoyne did not (for he could not) report it. Second the full effect of what happened afterwards was not felt for years. For example Frick vowed NEVER to re-hire the Strikers, his inability to get the plant back up without them forced Carnegie to replace Frick with Charles Schwab (No, NOT the Charles Schwab of today's discount Brokerage firms but Charles M. Schwab of Carnegie Steel, US Steel and Bethlehem Steel who died $300,000 in debt in 1939).
Charles Schwab managed to get the Homestead plant back up by firing all of the Striker Breakers that Frick had vowed to keep, and re-hired all of the Strikers that Frick had vowed NEVER to re-hire (Schwab rehired almost all of the strikers Except for the Union leadership). Schwab needed people who could work steel, the Strikers could, the Striker Breakers could not (Through most of the strikers were gone by 1900 once Schwab had the plant up and running had re-trained their replacements).
Second, while Carnegie wanted the Union broken, he did NOT want the men broken. This was a fine line Carnegie had followed since the 1860s. To avoid going over that line he had agreed to a contract in 1888, but in 1892 he still wanted the Union Broke, but was concerned as HOW the union was broken, as to breaking the union. After 1892 Carnegie's heart was never again in steel. His connection with his men was gone. He continued with Steel tell he sold his interest in 1901.
In my opinion Carnegie never forgave Frick for going over the line and breaking the men when Frick broke the Union. The problem was Carnegie did not want to accept the fact to break the union he had to break the men. In 1888 Carnegie had backed down when he had to choose between backing down and breaking the men. In 1892 he left it up to Frick. Frick was anti-union to the core and would do anything to break a union, legal illegal, moral or immoral. Carnegie hired Frick to break the Union and Frick did so. When Carnegie found out the cost he put the blame on Frick and never forgave him. Carnegie's previous right hand man, Captain Bill Jones had seen the effect of breaking the Union in the Edgar Thompson Works in 1887 and seems to have been the influence on Carnegie to sign a Union Contract in 1888 for the Homestead works. Captain Jones was killed in an industrial accident in 1889, leaving no one in Management that had any real connection with the workers. Jones had been Carnegie's connection, and seems to have advised Carnegie to accept the union At Edgar Thompson works in the early 1880s and Homestead in 1888 (But seems to be the way out with the crushing of the Union in Edgar Thompson in 1887).
Captain Jones is an interesting character in himself. He had left Cambria Steel do to missing a promotion he thought he should have received, and than was hired by Carnegie and became his right hand man in producing steel. Jones was offered stock, but refused he wanted to be on the same level as his workers, a wage earner. Carnegie obliged him and paid him $20,000 a year (In 1880s, the same rate the President of the US was getting, the highest rate of pay at the time period).
What would have happened had Jones not been killed in 1889? Could he have convinced Carnegie to back off? He was the only man that could have.
For more on Charles M. Schwab
http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=1958Some articles that Mention "Captain" Bill Jones (William R. Jones) I have NOT found a decent bio on Captain Jones on the net:
http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/tech/management/IncreasingEfficiencyinBusiness/chap3.htmlHistory of the Edgar Thomson Works (Till 1916): Mentions Caption Jones:
http://www.15122.com/3Rivers/History/BraddocksField/EdgarThomson.htm