Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

September New Home Sales: Lowest September Since 1981

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:34 AM
Original message
September New Home Sales: Lowest September Since 1981
This is the lowest sales for September since 1981. (NSA, 36 thousand new homes were sold in September 2008, 28 thousand were sold in September 1981).
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/10/september-new-home-sales-lowest.html




Don't ask MarketWatch, this is what they're telling me:
New-home sales perk up on gains in the West
Builders slash inventories of unsold homes by record 7.3% in September
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/new-home-sales-perk-up-gains/story.aspx?guid=%7BF6CA5F82%2D3199%2D493C%2D82B7%2D7DD2FC5C4172%7D


or

Bloomberg:
U.S. New-Home Sales Unexpectedly Climb 2.7%, Propelled by Price Declines


Deep into these articles this is the reality:
The median price of a new home decreased 9.1 percent from a year earlier to $218,400, the lowest since September 2004.
Sales were down 33 percent from September 2007, the Commerce report showed


I get so annoyed when I try to read the news in the morning only to get swindled by what I would hope would be reputable sources. They technically aren't lying but their choice of what to headline is extremely misleading. Had I not dug further, I would have thought all was well in the economy, disaster averted.


Up there it goes again. CNBC cheerleading the higher home sales. This chart says it all:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. 1981....hmmmm, who was in the WH then
oh yeah, Reagan... the great
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Saint Ronnie the "Great Communicator"
Say it ain't so Joe! Say it ain't so!

That man's REAL legecy and the reason why the Soviet Union fell: Single party rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I keep reminding myself about Reaguns tax cuts....
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Read my lips: no new taxes" is a now-famous phrase spoken by former American president and candidate George H. W. Bush at the 1988 Republican National Convention as he accepted the nomination on August 18. Written by speechwriter Peggy Noonan, the line was one of the most prominent soundbites from the speech. The pledge not to tax the American people further had been a consistent part of Bush's 1988 election platform, but its prominent inclusion in his speech cemented it in the public consciousness. The impact of the election promise was considerable, and many believe it helped Bush win the 1988 presidential election.

Once he became president, however, Bush raised taxes as a way to reduce the national budget deficit. Bush refused many times but was making no progress with a Senate and House that was controlled by Democrats. Bush later agreed to a compromise in which he worked with Congressional Democrats to raise several taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement. This reversal caused great controversy, especially in the more conservative wing of the Republican Party. Although technically there were no new taxes in this agreement, Bush in the same speech also ruled out raising existing taxes. In the 1992 presidential election campaign, Pat Buchanan made extensive use of the phrase in his strong challenge to Bush in the Republican primaries. In the election itself, Democratic nominee Bill Clinton, running as a moderate, also pointed to the quotation as evidence of Bush's untrustworthiness, which contributed to Bush losing his bid for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC