Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paying off on Credit Default Swaps is So Important

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 03:06 PM
Original message
Paying off on Credit Default Swaps is So Important

Here's something Senator Corker and Senator Shelby and the rest of the union-busting crowd ought to consider: the bankruptcy of GM will trigger the credit default swaps naming GM as the reference entity. A bailout won’t, according to the Bank of America.

The current gross notional amount of credit default swaps with GM as the reference entity is $44bn*. This is down from $65bn just three weeks ago. The net notional amount is $3.4bn, up bit since then. According to the DTTC, the notional amount is the maximum amount of money that will change hands on the occurrence of an event of default, after netting and application of collateral. The Bank of America says the cash requirement is around $4bn, again after netting and application of collateral. According to the Bank of America

"CDS contracts require daily posting of mark-to-market collateral posting," Taksler said. "Given that auto company bonds already trade in the $20s, the additional collateral posting prompted by a potential bankruptcy should be fairly small."

This implies that a large additional amount of collateral has been posted. That money is gone from the banking and investment sector, and isn’t available to be loaned out or otherwise put to good use. It is merely sitting in vaults, waiting around to see what happens to GM. Meanwhile, the price of GM CDSs has gone way up:

continued>>>
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/2261

Well. Isn't this interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting.
Very good info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You're very welcome dkf..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll say. Wheels within wheels. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So the auto bailout is actually a bailout of the financials again.
''Take Citigroup, with its $3tn plus in credit default swaps. Taxpayers are pouring money and guarantees into their treasury. Are they pouring money onto hedge funds and other buyers of protection, trying to prop up their swaps, or solving their exposure to GM and the other failing entities?

And, what about AIG? The Treasury is now participating directly in the shadow world, buying up securities insured by AIG through its CDSs, in the hope it will stop the bleeding of collateral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep! Which means Shelby will cave. It's just political theatre for his stupid voters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just a FWIW
check out the comments for some chilling reading. Oh and it will make you quite angry when you figure out what's been going on with our bailout money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not sure I buy this
The notional amount is not significant enough to make that much of a difference compared with amount already poured into the sieve of a financial industry we have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is the reason Bear Stearns was sold rather than being allowed to fail.
Failure would require a valuation of the company's assets, while a sale or bail-out doesn't. TPTB are deathly afraid of a mark-to-market cascade in derivatives of all kinds, and any single large corporate failure could trigger the general revaluation of a broad range of derivative instruments. So while $44 billion may not seem like a lot of money :-) it could be the straw that breaks that camel's back.

Unfortunately, it's probably just a matter of time until they can't avoid some event like that, and then the toxic sludge avalanche will begin in earnest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. A likely default by GM would trigger massive short sales on GM securities
The real danger of cds is not that someone has to payout claims on them (so what? issuer/insurer goes belly up?); it has to do with how the insurers/insurers raise the money to pay out claims.

Cds are like insurance, but it are not funded with reserves like normal insurance. Instead, the issuers of cds use complex hedging strategies that basically involve short selling on the issuer of the reference security.

That's why issuers/insurers actually don't go belly up; the who system is based on hedging, which means that as the company fails, the insurer makes on short sales exactly the amount of money needed to cover the cds contract.

So if we were to tell GM we're not bailing you out, issuers of cds would short sell all GM securities, covering their positions, but making the collapse of the firm inevitable.

Very few people actually understand the danger of cds -- Andrew Cuomo, maybe one NY Times reporter and a few bloggers. Most of the other stuff you read about them is crap.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC