Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress must tackle "too big to fail" problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:25 PM
Original message
Congress must tackle "too big to fail" problem

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congress should identify banks or other financial institutions that have become so large their failure poses a systemic risk and should put them under federal supervision, according to the Independent Community Bankers of America.

"Excessive concentration has led to systemic risk and the banking crisis that we now face," C.R. Cloutier, president of MidSouth Bank in Louisiana, told the U.S. House of Representatives antitrust subcommittee on Tuesday.

Cloutier, who represented the Independent Community Bankers of America, said the presidents of smaller institutions thought it unfair that large banks were bailed out, while community banks were shuttered when they ran out of funds.

"Community banks are angry," he said.

He called for an interagency task force that would identify banks that were so embedded in the U.S. financial network that they had become too big to fail. These would be put under federal supervision, potentially the Federal Reserve.

The large banks themselves would be required to fund this oversight.

Albert Foer, head of the independent American Antitrust Institute, said antitrust challenges in the courts were unlikely to succeed and urged the creation of a new position in the Justice Department -- deputy assistant attorney general for emergency restructuring -- to argue for antitrust concerns while crucial decisions were being made.

"Congress should assure that a loud competition voice is heard," said Foer, who argued the government should stop mergers that could create "an unreasonable systemic risk."

Over the past year, the top tier of the U.S. banking industry has changed drastically as venerable names disappeared, either into bankruptcy or absorbed into larger organizations.

In March 2008, JPMorgan Chase & Co agreed to buy the investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. Following that, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc sank into bankruptcy, JPMorgan has absorbed the failed Washington Mutual Inc, Bank of America Corp bought Countrywide Financial Corp and agreed to salvage Merrill Lynch & Co. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo & Co acquired Wachovia Corp.

(Editing by Andre Grenon)

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE52G6B920090317
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'Too Big to Fail' is the new '911 changed everything'
Buncha crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. BREAK them up -- re-instate the MONOPOLY laws
Quit jerking around trying to save these businesses -- put a stake through the heart of global multinational companies -- BREAK THEM UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Antitrust laws, if properly enforced,
would have prevented this whole mess.

But, the buybuybuy! mentality overruled the enforcement of the existing laws, and now, entities are "too big to fail," which was the whole purpose of the antitrust laws in the first place.

Put a huge amount of power/leverage in the hands of just a few, and, well, look what we have today.

The laws are there, but they have been ignored.

Nice work, all you lawyers in Congress. While the banking lobbies were filling your coffers, you also had the word "antitrust" conveniently erased from your brains - if you have brains.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes. But the Republicans wouldn't let anybody use them for 25 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Congress; too lethargic to act
Or is it too 'sold out'?
Or too corporatist.

Who are we kidding, there's only one party with differing brands and marginally different policies. At least Republicants fight like hell, and you KNOW they are out to screw you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC