Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ray Dalio: Why Bridgewater Won't Participate In Geithner's PPIP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:26 PM
Original message
Ray Dalio: Why Bridgewater Won't Participate In Geithner's PPIP
This is precisely why Stiglitz said the plan wouldn't work, btw (and DUers were calling him stupid for saying it :eyes:).

Ray Dalio: Why Bridgewater Won't Participate In Geithner's PPIP
http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-ray-dalio-why-bridgewater-wont-be-playing-tim-geithners-ppip-2009-4">The Business Insider

The bottom line? Too much political and reputation risk. If taxpayers ever figure out how badly they're getting screwed, there will be hell to pay for those who ran off with the loot.

Ray Dalio, who runs one of the largest hedge funds in the world, wrote a letter to his investors explaining why Bridgewater wants no part of Tim Geithner's trash-asset-purchase plan. He says that he thinks most big funds will decline to participate, leaving PIMCO, Blackrock, and a few others to run off with the taxpayer loot (and later be bashed for it).

We've excerpted the letter below. Much of it is a sophisticated analysis of the plan's economics, which is hard to follow if you're not obsessed with the PPIP. But here's Dalio's bottom line:

The only way the plan can work is if the investors buy the assets at low prices, the banks sell them at high prices, and the taxpayer covers the difference. Dalio is worried that, eventually, taxpayers will figure that out.

While we were initially considering participating in the Legacy Securities PPIP program, we decided against it based on how it is designed. Some of our investors asked for our reasoning, so we will explain it to you all.

Let’s start with the deal economics. In digging into the specifics, we learned that the program is not as attractive as it initially appeared to us. As you know, unlike many others, we don't think that most of these assets are all that cheap because we think that the debt problems will be worse than most others expect, we believe that the legal foundations of creditor rights will be in jeopardy and we think that liquidity in this environment is worth a lot. With these considerations, we find some of these assets a bit cheap, but not cheap enough to buy.

When the program was announced we were originally interested because with the non-recourse leverage (i.e. the ability to put the bad loses back to the government) we thought some of these assets could go for cheap enough prices to lead us to buy. However, as things now stand, very little leverage is actually being offered via the "Legacy Securities PPIP." The non-recourse leverage that Treasury is offering is only 1:1, though the PPIP Fact Sheet does allude to the potential that this may be re-levered in some unspecified way through the TAL F Program (no details on this are currently available). So, unless the leverage ends up being a lot greater than 1:1, the program offers little value to us (as the put has little value). Additionally, it now appears that participants will essentially be short an unspecified call option to the government in the form of warrants that must be issued by all PPIP chosen funds in order to comply with EESA (the legislation that created TARP). Therefore, without knowing the amount of leverage that will ultimately be provided (and for now looks pretty small), or the strike price of the warrants participating funds are short, we don’t have enough information to even assess the value of the program in aggregate.

http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-ray-dalio-why-bridgewater-wont-be-playing-tim-geithners-ppip-2009-4">read the whole letter


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftHandPath Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just another scam...
to stick it to the taxpayer.

Where are the cops? What is it going to take to end this madness?

I work hard, save, and pay my taxes so that I can be gang raped by bankers and my government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who the hell is bridgewater? Is that the bridge to no where they talk about in Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bridgewater Associates..
manages roughly $80 billion in global investments for a wide array of institutional clients, including foreign governments and central banks.

Ray Dalio, the founder of Bridgewater, is considered one of the world's most successful investors. Bridgewater's Pure Alpha fund returned 8.68 percent last year, according to Absolute Return magazine, while many hedge funds posted double-digit losses for the same period.

Bridgewater is precisely the kind of firm Geithner and the banks are hoping to lure into the PPIP program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are outstanding
I really have to thank you for finding this kind of information and posting it over and over. Kudos to you for spreading the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Greatly informative. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC