Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Creditors MUST Suffer Also

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 03:53 PM
Original message
Why Creditors MUST Suffer Also
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/why-creditors-must-suffer/">The Big Picture:

Why Creditors MUST Suffer Also

I frequently disagree with Tyler Cowen — our world economic views are quite different, as are, I assume, our politics. But his column in the http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/05/business/economy/05view.html&OQ=_rQ3D1&OP=70f16cf3Q2FQ27h3fQ27e7vJs77SQ23Q27Q23ccQ5BQ27cQ60Q27cQ7BQ27fdJlN3JJQ273v7N7Q3CqQ27cQ7Btl3hQ22kSQ3CQ26">Sunday Times today, I can find at least one major area where we are sympatico:

“But there is a big hole in these proposals, as there has already been in the government’s approach to bailing out failing financial companies. Even as they focus on firms deemed too big to fail, the new proposals immunize the creditors and counterparties of such firms by protecting them from their own lending and trading mistakes.

This pattern has been evident for months, with the government aiding creditors and counterparties every step of the way. Yet this has not been explained openly to the American public.

In truth, it’s not the shareholders of the American International Group who benefited most from its bailout; they were mostly wiped out. The great beneficiaries have been the creditors and counterparties at the other end of A.I.G.’s derivatives deals — firms like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, Société Générale, Barclays and UBS.

These firms engaged in deals that A.I.G. could not make good on. The bailout, and the regulatory regime outlined by Timothy F. Geithner, the Treasury secretary, would give firms like these every incentive to make similar deals down the road.


That is a huge flaw in the Paulson plan, now adopted by Geithner.

Tyler’s suggestion? Worry less about executive pay, and more creditor bailouts:

“Restricting compensation at these creditor firms would have more force — if it is done transparently, in advance and in accordance with the rule of law. A simple rule would be that some percentage of bailout funds should be extracted from the bonuses of executives on the credit or counterparty side of transactions.”


http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/why-creditors-must-suffer/">More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC