Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analyst: Wells Fargo will need $25 billion more in capital.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:17 PM
Original message
Analyst: Wells Fargo will need $25 billion more in capital.
From http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=aNsEBgrV8HA0">Bloomberg:

April 13 (Bloomberg) -- Wells Fargo & Co., the second- biggest U.S. home lender, may need $50 billion to pay back the federal government and cover loan losses as the economic slump deepens, according to KBW Inc.’s Frederick Cannon.

KBW expects $120 billion of “stress” losses at Wells Fargo, assuming the recession continues through the first quarter of 2010 and unemployment reaches 12 percent, Cannon wrote today in a report. The San Francisco-based bank may need to raise $25 billion on top of the $25 billion it owes the U.S. Treasury for the industry bailout plan, he wrote.

First-quarter net income rose 50 percent to about $3 billion, Wells Fargo said last week in announcing preliminary results that topped the most optimistic Wall Street estimates and sparked a 32 percent jump in the stock. The bank attributed the profit to a surge in mortgage originations and revenue from Wachovia Corp., acquired in December. Full results are scheduled for April 22.

<[b>“Details were scarce and we believe that much of the positive news in the preliminary results had to do with merger accounting, revised accounting standards and mortgage default moratoriums, rather than underlying trends,” wrote Cannon, who downgraded the shares to “underperform” from “market perform.” “We expect earnings and capital to be under pressure due to continued economic weakness.”

Wells Fargo raised its provision for loan losses by $4.6 billion in the quarter, below Cannon’s estimate of $5.4 billion. FBR Capital Markets analyst Paul Miller wrote after the announcement last week that he expected a $6.25 billion increase.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=aNsEBgrV8HA0">more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. aargghhhhh
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not one more penny
They should be placed in receivership. When is this administration going to confront the problems instead of covering them up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wells Fargo
I actually hope they make it, as they are my mortgage company. they have been good to me and have never screwed up the escrow and are always availably on the phone. By the way, do you know that Wells Fargo and BofA were once the same company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I find this befuddling...
Wells Fargo, is supposedly one of the most reputable banks. They are known for their conservative lending
and how they avoided giving out a lot of sup-prime loans. They are supposed to be the best...the good guys.

This really pisses me off, because last week--WF announced these amazing $3 billion earnings and the announcement
rocked Wall Street. The news was used to parlay a "good news in the banking sector" theme throughout the financial
media. The stock market went up hundreds of points the day WF announced this news and CNBC attributed the rise,
in large part, due to WF's awesome performance.

Now. We find out...oh well...the good news was really fancy-schmancy accounting and the result of acquiring Wachovia and
revised accounting. GEEEZ!!!

I'm so frickin tired of this manipulative BS! One minute, a company has wicked-awesome wonderful news and the market
soars. A few days later, we discover they lied their asses off and it's all smoke and mirrors.

I'd just like the truth. Please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Imagine Where Wells Fargo Would Be If It Had Gotten WaMu!
the mind boggles
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wall Street
Don't confuse news with the money grabbers way of getting people to invest so they have more to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Bingo. Smoke and mirrors.
These banks need to be put into receivership. The games need to end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gee didn't they just report a "profit"..
... makes you wonder if they really made anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. This would be more indication of the bottomless pit ...
We seem to be shoveling money into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC