Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Life on Severance: Comfort, Then Crisis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 01:47 PM
Original message
Life on Severance: Comfort, Then Crisis
NOVEMBER 10, 2009

Life on Severance: Comfort, Then Crisis

By MARY PILON
WSJ

SILVER SPRING, Md. -- Paul Joegriner hasn't worked since March 2008, when he was laid off from his $200,000-a-year job as chief executive officer of a small bank. But you wouldn't know it by appearances. His wife, Marzena, shuttles their two young children to private school every morning. The family recently vacationed in Virginia Beach, Va., and likes to dine on Porterhouse steaks. Since losing his job, Mr. Joegriner, 44 years old, has had several offers. He's turned each down in hopes of landing a position comparable to what he held before. When Severance Falls Short The family's lifestyle over the past year and a half has been propped up by a $200,000 severance package and another $100,000 in savings -- funds the family has burned through rapidly. By Mr. Joegriner's own calculations, the family will be out of money in six months if he doesn't find work.

(snip)

Mr. Joegriner is a member of what might be called the severance economy -- unemployed Americans who use severance pay and savings to maintain their lifestyles. Many lost their jobs in 2007 and 2008, and thought they'd soon find work. Now, they're getting desperate. Last week, lawmakers passed a bill extending unemployment benefits up to 20 weeks. Unemployment benefits, which typically last about 26 weeks, were expected to run out for 1.3 million people by the end of the year, according to the National Employment Law Project.

(snip)


Those affected often have trouble accepting their diminished prospects. Hefty severance packages, while intended as a safety net, can lull the unemployed into a false sense of security. Some people continue spending as before.. When Michelle Patterson was laid off as an executive director of marketing for a publishing company in January, she figured she could subsist comfortably, at least for a while, on the $20,000 she had reserved from her savings and severance combined. She continued to eat out regularly and made daily Starbucks runs. "It made me feel like I was still at work," says the 41-year-old resident of Newark, N.J. She spent as much as $250 a week on networking meals and drinks with contacts. Some days, she scheduled up to four coffee meetings a day, picking up the tab most of the time. She also spent $30 a month for pedicures and $150 on her hair.

The reckoning came in August, when she examined her finances. Her condo had been on the market for six months but she'd yet to receive a single offer. Her severance and savings were nearly gone. She finally cut her spending. She doesn't dine out anymore. Gone are the fancy salon visits; Ms. Patterson sips Starbucks just once a week. She downgraded her cable TV to basic channels, saving $8 a month. Ms. Patterson sometimes wishes she had cut her spending earlier. But the money spent networking and socializing, she says, has "helped keep sane." Like many of the long-term unemployed, she surfs sites like Monster.com and is a "serial résumé sender" -- emailing at least 10 résumés a day. Still, "I keep running into dead ends," she says. Coming to terms with the new job math hasn't been easy. Ms. Patterson's old salary was $140,000 a year. Now she is targeting jobs paying about half that. She recently turned down a per-diem arrangement earning $250 a week, or a mere $13,000 a year, selling education software.

After working for more than a decade in New York ad shops, Chuck Hipsher moved to Detroit in 2005. He took a position at the Campbell-Ewald agency, where he helped launch the Chevrolet Silverado campaign.. He met his wife at the ad agency, and the two had a $40,000 wedding. Kelly Hipsher, 32, was laid off in October 2007 and found out she was pregnant in February 2008. A week later, Mr. Hipsher's pink slip followed. Two months after that, the out-of-work couple moved to Greenville, S.C., to be closer to family and get a fresh start. Together, they had received about $60,000 in severance. "Now we have $600 to our name," says Mr. Hipsher. Although their rent was cheaper, Mr. Hipsher says the family continued to spend like before. They moved with three cars -- two BMWs and a Chevy Silverado. They continued to buy cases of $36-a-bottle wine. They spent $250 a month on a cleaning lady, and Mr. Hipsher dropped $50 a week on flowers for his wife. The couple still dined out regularly.


"We were stupid," he says. "You become accustomed to a certain lifestyle. When your world changes and things dictate that you change, you're pretty stubborn to give things up." He sold the BMWs and voluntarily turned in his beloved Silverado to avoid the repo man. "It was heartbreaking," he says. He replaced the fancy wheels with a Chrysler minivan. Before the layoffs, the Hipshers had no debt. Today, they owe about $70,000 -- including money borrowed from family members and $31,000 in credit-card debt. To hold off the collection companies that call daily, Mr. Hipsher says he is doing his best but is also considering filing for personal bankruptcy. After a stint selling new and used BMWs on a lot in Greenville, Mr. Hipsher recently began consulting for free for a small marketing firm, "to stay busy." In September, a Web solutions company hired him as a marketing director. Between salary and commission, he thought he could match half his old income. But so far, he says he's only received about $1,220. Tight for cash recently, he pawned his wife's $12,000 wedding ring for a $2,000 loan. He has until Dec. 28 to pay back the principal, plus $500 in interest -- or else he forfeits the ring. Looking back, he kicks himself for failing to enforce financial discipline right after losing his job in Detroit. "That precious nest egg is gone," he says.

(snip)


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125780714976639687.html (subscription)

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. No words.
It's difficult to feel sorry for these people; it's as if they live in some sort of alternate reality, oblivious to what might happen when the money's gone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I knw. We have been through several job loss
and we moved across the country, back and forth, several times.

The first thing we did is to see where we could cut expenses. Some 20 years ago we got a six month worth of severance pay that we managed to stretch it to last 9 months. And then one of us got a job, a lot less income and we had to move but we did it. Of course, there was no severe recession then and we did manage to sell the house but one can never know.

One of the paragraphs that I had to snip talks about how he starts by going to 7-11 to get a cup of coffee for both himself and his wife. And I thought: why can't you purchase a simple coffee maker - less that $50 - and the best quality coffee beans and brew it at home? You'll save both coffee and gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I lost my well-paying job in February.
I got a small severance but realized that had to make drastic changes so I could survive on unemployment for awhile and then what if that ran out too? I've had to do it before and I know how to survive on very little. Maybe that's why it was 'easier' for me than these people who are accustomed to living a certain lifestyle; people who have never had to worry about how they were going to eat or keep a roof over their heads.

I have an even better job now but I haven't adapted to it; I am chosing to live as if it could be gone tomorrow. Anything I purchase is cash (not using credit) and saving too.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Shoot, I inherited a middle class income 3 years ago
and I've managed to save nearly half of it because I've completely forgotten how to spend money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That sense of entitlement is certainly bizarre
I've fallen into poverty more than once and when it starts, I immediately hunker down in survival mode. Sometimes it's a false alarm and things go back to normal rather quickly. Sometimes it's not and survival mode becomes permanent for months or even years.

I guess when you coast through college and into a high paying career, there really isn't much incentive to consider what going into survival mode means. They really don't have a clue about going from steak to hamburger or hamburger to beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Boo-fuckin-hoo.
remind me, I will weep next Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't get it.
We are in a recession. I cut my spending and reduced savings and I have a job.
The idea you are unemployed and spend at 100% of normal seems insane to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's because these people think that they are entitled
They were entitled to purchase a house that they could not afford, they were entitled to spend money they didn't have, they were entitled to... be like the Jonses.

The only redeeming value that I could see is that as long as they spent, they helped sustain the businesses where they spent. This is the fallacy of a service based economy. We have to spend money that we don't have to sustain the economy and to prevent further layoffs.


:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I remember a comment from an anonymous person years ago
when we were first "told" we were moving from an industrial economy to a service economy. "Great now we will just be doing one another's laundry", and that's about how it has worked out.

These people aren't abnormal or stupid they are just in denial. Eventually they will all come to grips with reality but by then they will be dead broke and they will all be saying "if only".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alterfurz Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. to paraphrase some comic...
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 03:27 PM by alterfurz
...we are about to find out now if an economy can be based on everyone selling each other the contents of their garages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC