Perhaps you know the story. I found an English version here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19851586/"The city council of Abondance — its name a cruel reminder of the generous snowfall it once enjoyed — voted last month 9-6 to shut down the ski area that has been its economic raison d'etre for more than 40 years. The reason: not enough snow.
Abondance is the French Alps' first ski station to fall apparent victim to global warming. It will almost certainly not be the last."
...
"The Alps as a whole, which pull in about 70 million tourists every year primarily for winter sports, are "particularly sensitive" to climate change, according to a study last winter by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development."
Now I think it's time the deniers of G.W. start giving evidence. I posted something like this in the recent past.
The perspective about G.W. is that people denouncing cases are always forced to produce evidence twice as necessary.
The deniers just say NO.
I think the perspective should reverse: let's ask evidence for denying.
I'm a visitor of the Dolomiti ski area in North-Eastern Italy. On the Val di Fassa (Fassa Valley) there have been problems with snow. At lower stations you may witness lack of snow even in December and January. These are ski areas that have never witnessed such problems.
I think they'll have to turn to summer tourism to save their economy.
I hope Abondance will do it straight. A marketing plan may save the area turning it into a Summer resort.
Naturally, this won't solve the G.W. problem. To whom who believe it!