Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interior Delays Energy Permits At Hook & Bullet Request - Many Skeptical

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 09:34 AM
Original message
Interior Delays Energy Permits At Hook & Bullet Request - Many Skeptical
WASHINGTON - The Interior Department said Monday it will begin delaying some new oil and gas drilling projects until the effects on wildlife are studied more thoroughly.

But environmentalists said they were skeptical, since the department has routinely ignored its power to defer energy leases for the sake of wildlife. "Actions speak louder," said Peter Aengst, an energy policy analyst for The Wilderness Society in Bozeman, Mont. "I haven't yet seen where they're doing that. It's always been full speed ahead with energy development — lease, lease, lease."

Assistant Interior Secretary Rebecca Watson described the new policy as a response to American Wildlife Conservation Partners, a coalition of groups ranging from Ducks Unlimited to the National Rifle Association. She said it would apply to all 262 million acres — about one of every 10 in the United States — managed by Interior's Bureau of Land Management (news - web sites). "We value them because we think they're the experts on wildlife," Watson said.

EDIT

Watson said she told BLM managers to "use your power to temporarily defer leasing" for oil and gas drilling. "What this does is let the BLM managers hold back some areas while the new plans are being developed," she said. Watson said 22 of the new plans are "time-sensitive" because they respond to lawsuits, apply to new national monuments without old plans or speed energy development in New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and Montana."

EDIT



"We value them because we think they're the experts . . . " Condescending little tool, isn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is cute: "power to temporarily defer leasing"
How about the power to *permanently* withhold leasing? That seems like a more useful power to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. sounds like a wedge issue to me
Repubs have been raiding the demo base since Nixon, paybacks are a bitch. A lot of these folks may harbor various reactionary sentiments but they know what's most important, at least personally. Biophilia comes in various forms. Kerry ought to peel away those votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And it won't be hard to do . . .
LOTS of pissed-off hunters & fishers in Alaska about the Tongass logging approvals to date - to say nothing of Big Mac pricing for $10,000 old-growth trees.

Then there's Otero Mesa in NM, most of the Western Slope, and the groundwater contamination in Wyoming thanks to coal-bed methane. There is a lot of low-hanging fruit here just waiting for Kerry to pluck it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Democratic party also ought to...
make some kind of official, platform-like statement, promising that we will never try to take away anybody's hunting rifle, shotgun, etc. It's purely anecdotal, but many hunters I know appear to be nearly single-issue voters with respect to gun ownership rights.

Combine that with some tie-ins regarding Republican destruction of public hunting and fishing lands, and we could steal a lot of votes that we've lost over the years to Republican monopolization of 2nd-amendment issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC