Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Utah: improper home CNG auto conversions may be "car bombs"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:08 PM
Original message
Utah: improper home CNG auto conversions may be "car bombs"
The number of natural-gas tanks powering Utah vehicles has exploded this year. Now state officials and clean-car advocates want to ensure the tanks don't blow up, too, and that they pollute as little as intended.

The dozens who claimed clean-fuel tax credits by switching from gasoline earlier this decade mushroomed into the hundreds last year, but Questar fuel consumption suggests the real number of compressed-gas vehicles might have grown to 20,000 in the past year alone, according to the nonprofit Utah Clean Cities Coalition. The utility itself estimates the total is at least 6,000.

(...)

Many of the vehicles - including the nearly 700 that earned one-time tax breaks last year - are professionally equipped, safe and certified by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Others are backyard jobs with worn tanks and faulty exhaust systems, endangering both motorists and the Wasatch Front's air, Clean Cities Director Robin Erickson said. Those who buy old tanks or don't install kits properly are creating car bombs.

http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_10298405
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Total BS Story....
based on two possible problems. As to leaking exhaust, there is no problem, unless the stream of leaking exhausted gas is directly aimed at the supposed "worn tanks". In a propane conversion no one in their right mind lines the tanks up near the exhaust.

But tanks don't wear-they age into metal fatigue-just like an airplane fuselage that pressurizes and depressurizes-after all, nothing abrades or erodes a tank. If a tank were to fatigue and fail pressure loss would be dangerous but of brief duration.

The story refers to "smelling" propane in the rear seat of cars
-HORSESHIT-on two counts-if a tank fails it empties in minutes, and if a joint unseals in a project to save money the propane becomes the smell of money-if you smell propane then your first reaction is to stop any joint leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Accident/Fire concern is valid
Improperly secured and/or vented tanks is a safety concern.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC