Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuyahoga River Fire Galvanized Clean Water and the Environment as a Public Issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 09:48 PM
Original message
Cuyahoga River Fire Galvanized Clean Water and the Environment as a Public Issue

Firefighters battle a fire on Ohio's Cuyahoga River in 1952. The 1969 blaze, one of nine on the river since 1868, came at a time of increasing environmental awareness and symbolized years of environmental neglect. This, in turn, helped spur grassroots activism that resulted in a wave of federal legislation devoted to clean air, clean water, and natural resource protection.
-----------

Environmentalists observing 2009 as "The Year of the River" are celebrating the remarkable return to health of the Cuyahoga River over the last four decades. But before there was a Cuyahoga comeback, the Cuyahoga was a catalyst.

When the oily, murky and sluggish waterway caught fire in June 1969, it not only caught the attention of a previously indifferent industrial nation -- it also ignited an already smoldering ecological movement. That movement toward environmental responsibility included the first Earth Day and passage of the federal Clean Water Act of 1972, still the most influential water improvement measure on the books.

"The fire did contribute a huge amount to the new environmental movement and it put the issue in front of everyone else, too," said Jonathan Adler, environmental historian and law professor at Case Western Reserve University. "Water pollution became a tangible, vivid thing -- like it had never been on a national level.

"There was a sense of crisis at that point. It was: Oh, my God -- rivers are catching on fire.' "

Of course, raging rivers of fire weren't unheard of in Cleveland. In fact, the Cuyahoga had burned at least nine times since the late 1860s. The river was increasingly filled with flammable liquids as it drained Cleveland industrial byproducts into an equally polluted Lake Erie. Oil slicks on the river surface burned much worse in the past. Among them: A 1912 fire had killed five dock workers when the blaze spread to the shipyards and a 1952 fire caused an estimated $1.5 million in damage.

But while some of those earlier disasters had commanded banner headlines in The Plain Dealer and the now-defunct Cleveland Press, they didn't appear to dent the broader consciousness of an American public focused on economic progress. "In both Cleveland papers, the news was the damaged trestles, not the burning river," write history professor David Stradling of the University of Cincinnati and brother-journalist Richard Stradling. The duo's paper, "Perceptions of a Burning River," was published in the July 2008 Environmental History magazine.

"Remember, a lot of people saw a filthy river as a sign of progress, not a problem at all," Adler said.

More: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/04/12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Nixon gets a bad rap
I've said it before and I'll say it again: he signed into law ALL our important national environmental legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. VERY true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Great bit of history on that:
With major props to Rachel Carsen, doubtlessly one of your heroes and mine:

http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/epa/15c.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Nixon was a political animal
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 10:38 AM by OKIsItJustMe
Ecology was a hot "button" topic at the time.


http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=247072

Roberts Helps Devise McGovern Ecology Policy

Published On Tuesday, October 10, 1972 12:00 AM
By JEREMY S. BLUHM

A young Harvard economist played a key role in the preparation of a comprehensive environmental policy statement released Sunday by the McGovern-Shriver campaign.

Serving as executive director of McGovern's advisory panel on environmental issues, Marc J. Roberts '64, associate professor of Economics, worked with members of McGovern's "issues" staff in assembling and selecting the proposals that went into the statement.



The statement begins with an attack on President Nixon's environmental record, which it calls "fertile with rhetoric but barren in performance." It charges that the Nixon administration has attempted to weaken proposed legislation, that it has failed to spend millions of dollars appropriated for environmental protection, and that it has failed to enforce existing legislation "energetically or effectively."

The remainder of the statement is devoted to McGovern's "agenda for environmental action." The "main initiatives," according to the statement, include these:



Nixon responded to public pressure. In those days, the ecology movement had a lot of public backing. As for Nixon (frankly) ecological legislation was a bone he could throw to all of the lefties who didn't like "The War."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. The great Randy Newman wrote a song about it..
'Burn On', from the album 'Sail Away'

There's a red moon rising
On the Cuyahoga River
Rolling into Cleveland to the lake

There's a red moon rising
ON the Cuyahoga River
Rolling into Cleveland to the lake

There's an oil barge winding
Down the Cuyahoga River
Rolling into Cleveland to the lake

There's an oil barge winding
Down the Cuyahoga River
Rolling into Cleveland to the lake

Cleveland city of light city of magic
Cleveland city of light you're calling me
Cleveland, even now I can remember
'Cause the Cuyahoga River
Goes smokin' through my dreams

Burn on, big river, burn on
Burn on, big river, burn on
Now the Lord can make you tumble
And the Lord can make you turn
And the Lord can make you overflow
But the Lord can't make you burn

Burn on, big river, burn on
Burn on, big river, burn on


-Randy Newman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-12-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't the mayor's hair catch fire that year also? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, that was a few years later.
He was trying to open a new steel plant by cutting a steel ribbon with an acetylene torch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. People don't understand what we had
as a resource in Lake Erie, the other Great Lakes and The Ohio River. At one time these bodies of water were the greatest freshwater fisheries on earth. Consider for a moment, the most commonly harvested commercial fish in Lake Erie, the blue pickerel, a subspecies of walleye, is now extinct. And the lake sturgeon is nearly extinct. Both fish were an incredible source of protein for native inhabitants for centuries. Pollution and uncontrolled commercial fishing caused the damage. Today's recreational angler thinks Lake Erie has recovered from the ravages of pollution and overfishing-nothing could be further from the truth.

Sauger and walleye stack up below the dams on the Ohio River by the millions as they unsuccessfully try to make their spawning runs to the headwaters of the Allegheny, Monongahela and Muskingum rivers. These once great commercial fish are so full of mercury, dioxin and other chemical pollution that they remain unsafe to eat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I once watched a guy on a fishing show
dress out a 5 lb coho taken from lake Erie. By the time he was done removing the parts most likely to concentrate toxic waste he was left with a couple of fillets that weighed less than a pound each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, I've seen the same. And most anglers
don't take the time and care to remove the fatty portions. Such a shame.

I have an old issue of Fishing Facts Magazine. The magazine included the original voting record for the Clean Water Act. Only a scant few Republicans voted yes. I guess their aim was to protect the corporations, and their right to pollute, at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC