Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environmental Defense Will Sue EPA On Newly Published Mercury Rule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-05 04:59 PM
Original message
Environmental Defense Will Sue EPA On Newly Published Mercury Rule
(Plus I heard this story on PRI's "Marketplace", but for some reason, the audio stream isn't working:
EPA outlines new cancer risks for kids, but no new rules

Some chemicals may be far more dangerous for kids than previously thought - as much as ten times more likely to cause cancer. So says the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA updated its cancer risk guidelines today. But if you're expecting tough new rules...you may be waiting awhile. (because the report is full of changes, made by the Corporations at fault)From our Health Desk at WGBH, Helen Palmer reports.

Environmental Defense Will Sue EPA On Newly Published Mercury Rule

Announcement Comes On Same Day That EPA Delists Mercury Pollution From Power Plants As Hazard

March 29, 2005

Today Environmental Defense announced its intent to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for its failure to protect the nation against the health hazards of mercury pollution from coal-fired power plants. The announcement comes on the same day that EPA published its determination, originally announced on March 15, which will take immediate legal effect, reversing the Agency's 2000 decision to regulate mercury pollution from coal-fired power plants under the Clean Air Act's hazardous air pollution control program. "We are compelled to take legal action because EPA's rule reflects flawed science, a flawed reading of the law and a failure to protect the nation's most vulnerable populations from the health hazards of mercury pollution," said Environmental Defense senior attorney Vickie Patton. "The EPA's mercury rule needlessly exposes another generation of children to toxic mercury pollution when cost-effective solutions are at hand," said Environmental Defense attorney Janea Scott.

The administrative action taken today by the EPA will have immediate consequences for some dozen or more new coal-fired power plants proposed across the interior western United States. These facilities, comprising some 8000 megawatts of new coal-fired generation capacity, will be categorically exempted from the Clean Air Act requirement to install the best pollution controls for mercury thereby allowing a new fleet of coal plants to advance without modern mercury control measures.

(clip)

One study, by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, estimated that reducing power plant mercury emissions by about 60 percent could result in up to 5 billion dollars in annual health benefits due to heart attacks prevented, assuming the cardiovascular effects of mercury observed in males who consume non-fatty fish are experienced by the whole U.S. population. A second study, by doctors at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine's Center for Children's Health and the Environment, estimated the annual health costs of the neurotoxic effects of mercury on children from U.S. power plants to be 1.3 billion dollars.
(more at link above)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Filius Nullius Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mercury
I remember reading an article in National Geographic when I was a kid back in the mid to late '60s about a fishing village on a bay in Japan. There were paper plants in the area that discharged mercury into the bay along with other pollutants. The people's diet consisted largely of fish which bioaccumulated the mercury, which is a potent neurotoxin. The article described the kinds of neurological problems that were afflicting villagers of all ages. Many children and adults were rendered almost completely spastic. It was horrible. The article made a big impression on me and made me realize the seriousness of mercury pollution.

Now the Bush Administration is proposing to weaken the rules for power plants by the adoption of cap-and-trade rules. Trading credits for mercury emissions is completely inappropriate. The areas in which higher emissions are permitted due to the effect of these rules will become environmental ghettos. Local inhabitants who can not afford to move away may experience higher rates of neurological damage. Why should the executives of these power companies be allowed to decide whom they will subject to the higher rates of mercury contamination? No, we need to strengthen the limits on mercury across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. "EPA Delists Mercury Pollution From Power Plants As Hazard" "
This is mind-boggling considering the new study linking the mercury pollution to autism.

Reported in the news on March 16th.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1318974


How can they "delist" it? I don't get it. Poison more children...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is what happens when you abandon the Enlightenment.
The Bush administration doesn't believe in objectivity. In our new Dark Age, ignoring a problem is equivalent to solving a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Mercury Pollution, High Lead levels and this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. FSTV showed Robert Kennedy Jr. giving this speech at Berkeley
It's a good summary and history of the politics. The full text is here:

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0223-25.htm

"...We know that the principal source of ozone and particulates in our air is coming from 1,100 coal-burning power plants that are burning coal illegally. They were supposed to install controls over fifteen years ago. The Clinton administration was prosecuting 75 of the worst of those plants. But this industry gave $48 million to President Bush during the 2000 campaign, and they've contributed $58 million since. One of the first things that President Bush did when he came to office was to order the Justice Department to drop all 75 of those suits. The Justice Department lawyers were shocked. This has never happened in our history before, where somebody running as a presidential candidate accepts money from a criminal and then lets that criminal off the hook. Many of you remember what happened when President Clinton pardoned Mark Rich and how indignant the press and the public was at that action. But Mark Rich was one person, and he never killed anybody. According to EPA, these 75 plants, just the criminal exceedences from these plants, kill 5,500 Americans every year. After letting these criminals off the hook, the president then went and rewrote the Clean Air Act, illegally we believe. We're suing him, we'll win the suit, but it may take ten years, and in the meantime they'll discharge what they want.

I live in New York State. Most of the fish in New York are now unsafe to eat from mercury contamination. I live two miles from the state of Connecticut; in Connecticut every freshwater fish is now unsafe to eat. Last week, the Fish and Wildlife Service announced that in 19 states it is unsafe to regularly eat any freshwater fish, and in 48 states at least some fish are unsafe to eat. The mercury is coming, largely, from those same 1,100 coal-burning power plants. We know a lot about mercury that we didn't know five or ten years ago. We know that one out of every six American women of childbearing years now has so much mercury in her womb that her children are at risk for a grim inventory of diseases: cognitive impairment; mental retardation; autism; blindness; kidney, liver or heart disease. I have so much mercury in my body, I was told by Dr. David Carpenter, who is the national authority on mercury contamination, that if I were a woman of childbearing years and produced a child, that the child would have cognitive impairment, and, he estimated, a permanent IQ loss of five to seven points. There are 630,000 children born in this country every year who have been exposed to dangerous levels of mercury in the womb.

Recognizing this threat to the American public, the Clinton administration reclassified mercury as a hazardous pollutant under the Clean Air Act; that triggered the requirement that those companies remove 90 percent of that mercury within three and a half years. It would have cost, according to EPA, less than one percent of the revenues of those plants for them to do that. That's a great deal for the American people, but it's still billions of dollars for that industry. Eight weeks ago, Bush announced that he was scrapping the Clinton-era rules and substituting, instead, rules that were written by the industry's lobbying firm Latham and Watkins. On their face, they say that they have to clean up, within fifteen years, 50 percent of the mercury. But they've woven so many loopholes into the new rule that they will literally never have to clean up. The chief lobbyist for the firm who wrote it is now the head of the Air Division at EPA...."


more info:

http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC