Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seawater enters reactor core at nuclear plant, Hamaoka nuclear plant in Shizuoka Japan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:46 PM
Original message
Seawater enters reactor core at nuclear plant, Hamaoka nuclear plant in Shizuoka Japan
Edited on Sat May-21-11 12:55 PM by Fledermaus
TOKYO — Some five tons of seawater is estimated to have entered a reactor core at the Hamaoka nuclear power station in central Japan, the operator said on Thursday. That followed the discovery of an estimated 400 tons of seawater that has inundated the main steam condenser at reactor 5 of the Hamaoka nuclear plant in Shizuoka prefecture, south-west of Tokyo.

Chubu Electric Power Co, which runs the plant, found the 400 tons of seawater while shutting down the reactor as requested by the government. Chubu Electric officials said their assessment of the purity of water inside the pressure vessel showed some 5 tons of seawater came from the condenser. The utility will not decommission the reactor. Instead, it will dilute and desalinate the seawater to prevent any corrosion inside the reactor as salt causes corrosion.

The steam condenser, designed to convert waste steam from a power-generation turbine into water, has some 64,000 tubes, each 3 centimetres in diameter, where seawater is injected to cool the steam, Jiji reported. The operator is now pumping fresh water into the pressure vessel to reduce the concentration of salt in the water to avoid corrosion of the vessel, company officials were quoted as saying by Jiji.
On May 9, Chubu Electric decided to suspend the operation of the plant located near a geological fault line after Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan called for the shutdown over growing public concern about another possible nuclear accident after the nuclear emergency triggered by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
http://main.omanobserver.om/node/51809
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which means ....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If it got into the core, the heat exchangers are leaking.
Edited on Sat May-21-11 01:10 PM by Fledermaus
I doubt that it will be another Fukushima, but it raises many questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Which are...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They are small tubes that the radioactive steam travel through. They are surrounded by sea water.
Heat is exchanged. The sea water heats up and the steam cools down. They don't mix unless there is a leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would be nice to have an accurate schematic of the water flows for these plants.
Too much to ask for today's press, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. It amazes me that you can "discover" 400 TONS of seawater
that's more like somebody fucked up bad or tried to cover it up until they got caught - oh we just FOUND 400 tons of seawater BTW. ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly what I am thinking. How long ago did this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Assuming they are metric tons, that 400 cubic meters or approximately 400 cubic yards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Bill Lumbergh, anyone?

Yeah, I'm gonna have to go ahead and ask you to come in this Saturday because we've been having some problems with the heat exchangers, okay? And I'm gonna have to also go ahead and ask you to remove the 400 tons of seawater from the reactor core, okay, thanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Oh great!!!!!
NO. not really... this could muck up the reactor badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC