Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Air Conditioner Standard Is Rejected (Clinton standard restored)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 08:27 AM
Original message
Bush Air Conditioner Standard Is Rejected (Clinton standard restored)
Bush Air Conditioner Standard Is Rejected (Clinton standard restored)


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3622767,00.html

Bush Air Conditioner Standard Is Rejected

Wednesday January 14, 2004 9:31 AM
By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal court rebuked the Bush administration and ordered it to restore Clinton administration efficiency standards that would make air conditioners use less energy and save consumers money on their electricity bills.

The court said Tuesday the Energy Department violated the intent of Congress when it rolled back the regulation that required a 30 percent increase in energy efficiency in all new home central air conditioners beginning in 2006.

The department had replaced the regulation with a more modest one that would require a 20 percent increase, arguing that to go further would make air conditioning units too expensive and even prevent poor people from buying air conditioners.

Environmentalists and energy efficiency experts rejected those claims. The Natural Resources Defense Council, consumer groups and attorneys general from 10 states filed a lawsuit to challenge the decision.

On Tuesday, the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in New York ruled that the so-called SEER-13 standard issued by the Clinton administration was valid and could not legally be lowered, even though the standard had not yet gone into effect. <snip>

The more stringent standard will save 14,500 megawatts during peak summer demand periods, enough to replace 50 power plants, said Andrew DeLaski, executive director of the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, a group advocating energy efficiency improvements.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. This seems like a big story to me.
Reducing summer demand so that we don't need as many plants at peak capacity. 14,500 megawatts is about what all of Ontario was using during their energy crunch after the blackout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC