Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Nuclear Headache: What if the Radicals Oust Musharraf?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Malvina Reynolds Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 05:24 PM
Original message
A Nuclear Headache: What if the Radicals Oust Musharraf?
Two recent assassination attempts against Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, have renewed concern in the Bush administration over both the stability of a critical ally and the security of its nuclear weapons if General Musharraf were killed or removed from office.

>

The degree to which the United States may have aided in that process is a secret, in part because the Bush administration does not want to worsen anti-American sentiment in Pakistan. But there are other reasons, administration and Pentagon officials say.

Pakistan has not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and so the United States is prohibited from sharing certain technology. But two years ago a senior American official said the Bush administation would not let those rules be an impediment to improving the safety of the Pakistani arsenal.

>

"It's very unsettling what these assassination attempts imply, that the inner security circle for Musharraf has been breached," said Gaurav Kampani of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. "If security for the president, for the head of the Pakistani Army, cannot be guaranteed, what guarantee is there that nuclear assets and missiles and so forth are safe?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/30/international/asia/30DIPL.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. We wont let that happen.


I think America is on top of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. More likely event: Pakistan gets tired of being occupied by crusaders

And demonstrates that America does not control South Asia.

Hilarity ensues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-03 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Crusaders?
Aren't you off by about eight centuries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It only seems like that at times
He is referring back to several comments Bush* made along with several missteps by the Military (Infinite Justice comes to mind), all of which brought into play the US as modern day Crusaders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The US as modern day crusaders
is a notion that the radical Jihadist groups have been pimping long before the US had a presence in Pakistan. Long before 9/11. Long before any verbal missteps by the US military or Bush.

I just thought it odd that DuctapeFatwa was furthering the same lie as the radical Jihadist.

Perhaps I misunderstand his use of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let them destroy each other.
Edited on Tue Dec-30-03 05:47 PM by Darranar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC