Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Easy access to guns"- The new gun grabbers talking point?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:58 PM
Original message
"Easy access to guns"- The new gun grabbers talking point?
What does it mean? In what way is it easier now to access guns than it was in 1965?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you familiar with how fear made normal Americans trash everything in their history?
same thing here

from a marketing stand point the gun makers and sellers are really doing a great job in bad economic times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Using the phrase "gun grabbers' labels you as a wingnut...
When was a gun taken from a law-abiding citizen? Perhaps you can find a more accurate way to express your views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wingnut labels you as a gungrabber.
Must I list the various gun bans placed on law abiding citizens? Ask the citizens of New York city if they have not had to give up their legal firearms......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. GODDAMN IT, YOU CAIN'T INTIRFEAR WITH THE SEKOND AMENDMINT RITES!11!!!!1
ANY PERSON, NO MATTER HOW CRIMINAL OR HOW INSANE HAS THE RITE TO GO TO A GUN SHOW AND BYE AS MANY GODDAMN ASSAULT RIFLES, ROCKET LAUNCHERS, OR WHATEVER THE HELL HE WANTS WITHOUT A BACKGROUND CHECK BECAUZE THAT'S WHAT GLENN BECK TOLD ME THE SEKOND COMMANDMENT SAYZ !!1!!!1!!!!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I NEED MY GUN TO SECURE THE BRODERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. What are the Broders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You are on the wrong site. Even the NRA supports restrictions on criminals and the mentally ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Then why are they consistently opposed to closing the gun show loophole
Which is where most psychos and criminals buy their guns, because they wouldn't pass a background check elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Doesn't make much sense to regulate private sales only at gun shows.
How would that stop someone from approaching a seller and saying hey I'll buy that gun but my money is in my car let's go to the parking lot? Unless you want to regulate all private sales. Many pro-gun people here have called for the opening of the NICS to the public so private sellers could ensure they are selling firearms to people legally allowed to own them. I would like to see some research proving that most criminals buy their guns at gun shows that are usually crawling with uniformed and plainclothes cops.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. THERE IS NO GUN SHOW LOOPHOLE
Every gun I have ever purchased at a gun show has required the seller to do a background check on me. Show me the gun show loophole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Agreed
I don't know that specifics, but to my knowledge anyone with a FFL can't make private transfers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Because you don't know what you're talking about.
Let me know if you see a criminal walk into a gun show and buy a gun from a dealer without a background check. Because if they do, a felony has been committed.

If they buy from a private individual who is not a dealer, psst... not to alarm you, but that happens EVERY DAY all across the country, with no connection to a gun show, when people sell 'privately' from one individual to another, in the newspaper, to a friend, to a co-worker, to a family member, at a garage sale, estate sale, etc, etc. Happens every day. Oh god the huge manatee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. How about you do your own thinking and not believe everything the antis tell you
Dept of Justice

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf

Source of firearm used by felon
Retail 8%
Pawnshop 4%
Flea Market 1%
Gun Show 1%
Freinds/Family 40%
Street/illegal 40%

numbers rounded by me for ease of reading.

Remember this includes first time felons who were not a felon prior to conviction and thus COULD LEGALLY purchase firearms.
Even still gunshows account for <1% of all firearms used in crime.

Any more Brady talking points you need knocked down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Furyataurus Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Actually, statistical
I'm sure the brady dolts/vpc etc consider ANYTIME a gun is sold to be a "gun show" :eyeroll:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Furyataurus Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
47. Have you EVER been to a gunshow?????
Next time dress like a thug/gang banger and see if a PRIVATE seller will sell to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. Most criminals acquire guns through straw purchases, not at gun shows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Thank you for using part of your valuable time to respond.
I found your response somewhat lacking in substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. WOW
Do you know how intellegent you sound in this post.

I mean really, start on decaf, prozac, something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. Do you actually think that reflects current U.S. law?
You do know that assault rifles and rocket launchers are as tightly controlled as howitzers, and buying any gun from a gun show dealer requires the same Federal background check as at a gun store, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
49. Do you even have any knowledge of reality?
For starters, rocket launchers and assault rifles are governed under the National Firearms Act of 1934, and as such are phenomenally expensive.

Second, dealers operating at gun shows have to perform background checks the same as if they were selling out of their stores. The "gun show loophole" is a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. New Orleans after Katrina. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. And yet the gun nuts continue to buy the "Libruls wanna grab your guns!!!1!!" horseshit from the NRA
When it was only Blackwater, under the command of the Bush Crime Family, that actually ever did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Actually, the New Orleans gun confiscations caught on camera were DEA, California Highway Patrol,
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 09:56 PM by benEzra
and a few rogue Oklahoma National Guard units.

BTW, "liberals" have not by and large been particularly interested in new gun bans, although there are some exceptions. The ban-popular-guns fervor within the party in the '90s was driven almost entirely by the Third Way types at the DLC, who hoped to use the "assault weapon" fraud and other bans as a way to look "tough on crime" to right-leaning law-and-order types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. To be honest
I think both party's if they thought they could get away with it would disarm the public in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. Ask the folks in CA who registered their 'assault weapons'
Then were told later that they had to turn them in, sell them, or transfer them out of state..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. How about the Katrina gun confiscation and California...
Controversy arose over a September 8 city-wide order by New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass to local police, National Guard troops, and US Marshals to confiscate all civilian-held firearms. "No one will be able to be armed," Compass said. "Guns will be taken. Only law enforcement will be allowed to have guns." Seizures were carried out without warrant, and in some cases with excessive force; one instance captured on film involved 58 year old New Orleans resident Patricia Konie. Konie stayed behind, in her well provisioned home, and had an old revolver for protection. A group of police entered the house, and when she refused to surrender her revolver, she was tackled and it was removed by force. Konie's shoulder was fractured, and she was taken into police custody for failing to surrender her firearm.<70><71> Even National Guard troops, armed with assault rifles, were used for house to house searches, seizing firearms and attempting to get those remaining in the city to leave.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_re...

For a link on the California gun confiscation visit:
http://www.nrawinningteam.com/confiscation/calockyer.html#letters



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its always been easy. Nothing has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. In 1965 I could mail order guns with no paperwork.
Please direct me to where I can do that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's easier. But it is still easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkaway Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I sure in some third world country. You might want to move there!
I don't want to grab your gun. Keep it.

I want everyone to make the children and friends of extremists and gun lovers like you feel like outcasts.

We don't need to take your guns. We need to mock you in movies, trash your redneck image and turn you into something to be avoided until you and your kind vanish like the dinosaurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Good luck with that.
Recent Supreme Court decisions and the growth of CCW legislation seem to indicate that the American public is in the process of codifying the ownership of guns in our culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. You know in polls here on this site
around half are gun owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Ah, a propaganda war!
Good luck scooter, mocking gun owners in movies? Seems like Hollywood glorifies gun violence rather than mocking it. When your movie premiers you be sure to let us know, m-kay? I wish you luck in your future endeavors however fruitless they may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrCory Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. You Are Advocating...
The manufacture and propagation of a bigoted stereotype?

"trash your redneck image..."

My, how liberal of you :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
43. You think
that it's only white "rednecks" who own guns? Hahahahaha! I don't have numbers, but I would guess that American native folks are among, if not the most, heavily armed ethnic group in the U.S. Here on my home rez, and on reservations throughout Indian country, most homes come with firearms. We had to learn our lesson the hard way as to what happens when the government disarms a population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dashrif Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. You
Got that right

There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.

Will Rodgers,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. What? "Love it or leave it" from a liberal? Reading Rove's prompter?...
You have with your comments proved up what many folks have been saying about liberals and progressives for some time: their capacity for prejudice, hatred, bigotry and mean-spiritedness is just as great as any other's. Actually, this is what you expect from culture warriors.

But since you like this war (and seem to get off fighting it), please be informed that you are on the losing side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Well, the good old days. Thank goodness that is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Try a gun show (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Try going to one and buying a gun first before you throw that out there.
Yes, you can buy a few guns from private individuals at a gun show. The majority of sales are made by licensed gun dealers who have to follow the same procedure they do at their gun stores.

Oh, I might add gun shows are not a new thing & they do not provide "easy access" to guns any more than they did thirty years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
45. The procedures, regulations, laws, etc. are no different at a gun show than anywhere else
Here in California, where private-party transfers of used firearms are regulated, there is a background check and 10-day wait on every transfer just as there is in a sporting goods store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. And in 1962 you could mail order LSD
Some idiot ex marine used a mail order rifle to kill a Great President. That lead to a thoughtful law.

Here again is the real deal on the NRA bull crap that goes unchallenged by crazy wingnuts.


THE TRUTH:
Barack Obama has stated unequivocally that law-abiding Americans have the right to purchase, own, transport, and use guns responsibly, including for the purpose of protecting their families. So this line of attack is particularly scurrilous, as it uses terrifying imagery and outright lies to attack Obama.

The TV ad dubiously cites a vote Obama took in the Illinois State Senate in 2004, in which he voted against a measure that created a loophole for people caught in violation of local gun registration laws—a bill that had nothing to do with whether or not a person was legally justified in using a firearm to protect their home or family. Obama voted to maintain a small provision of state law that ensured that those who fail to properly register dangerous weapons face the usual legal penalty. It is a piece of state legislative minutia that is almost too obscure and inconsequential to mention, let alone distort.

But the truth is rarely a hindrance to desperate groups dealing in smears and scare tactics.
The NRA’s lies are transparent, so much so that North Carolina’s Citizen-Times gave the ads an “F” for twisting Obama’s position “almost out of whole cloth,” and many other news outlets have wholeheartedly condemned the ad campaign as well.

Please help make sure that everyone you know understands the truth about Barack Obama’s positions, and the lies they’re being sold by the NRA.

Credits:
FactCheck.org: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/nra_targets_oba...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Things have changed...
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 08:27 PM by quiller4
I remember when you could walk into any sporting goods store, pay for a pistol and leave with that pistol. That is no longer the case. You must complete a lengthy form and submit to a records check that is supposed to be "instant" but often isn't. Now I'm not objecting to a records check. I actually think that is sound policy but it does represent a change.

Previously only felony convictions disqualified an individual and even convicted felons who had served their term and paid all fines could apply for restoration of second amendment rights.

Now even a misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence is disqualifying and there is no longer a provision for restoration of rights.

Not that long ago my husband could have made a gift of a rifle and shipped it to one of his nephews. Now he has to pay a local firearms dealer (WA) to ship to another dealer where his nephew lives (HI). It makes no difference that the nephew is a 29 year old veteran of two tours of duty in Afghanistan.

I am not arguing for or against these changes--only pointing out that we've come a long way from the days when anyone could mail order or purchase in person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. It doesn't matter, they have no ally in the Democratic party anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wartrace Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. No clear explanation of what this "easy access" is after 15 posts?n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Some context might be helpful.
;-)

Where did the term originate? How was it used?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Access to guns has been dramatically restricted since 1960
In 1960 I (if I was alive) could with very little difficulty buy a new in the box fully automatic AK-47, M-16, or M-14.
I could walk in with cash and leave with a normal rifle or pistol with no questions asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yay Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
55. No you coulden't
You still needed to get the $200 tax stamp on you're brand new AK, which just like today still took a couple months for a first timer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Access is not easy for people who follow the laws. For those that don't follow laws
there are a lot of ways to get them illegally and there are a lot guns to be had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. So more laws restricting firearms will help how??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Where did I say they would help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dashrif Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. Easy access to guns
It's me I am the talking point a non felon that can clear a ncis check in 30 sec and can walk out with whatever I have money for ooooooh scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
37. Back in 1965, you could order this through the mail...
Edited on Sun Apr-05-09 10:05 PM by benEzra


and none other than John F. Kennedy owned one of the first ones in the early '60s (they hit the U.S. civilian market in 1961 or 1962, I believe). Prior to 1961, you could buy an M1 carbine instead. AFAIK, the above ad is circa 1965. The "mousegun" has since become the most popular civilian rifle in America.

Trivia fact of the day:

The first 30-round civilian rifle was the Evans rifle of 1873.



That model was made 1873-1879, and capacity 28 to 34 rounds, depending on model. Caliber was .44 Evans, similar to .44-40. The magazine was helical, like a modern Calico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-08-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
53. back in 1965.......
I came back from southeast Asia with one of these



on a DD Form 603-1. After arriving in-country, an ATF Form 4, a signature from my local sheriff, fingerprints, and paying the $200 tax was all it took to comply with the NFA. After 1968, changes in the law made that impossible. However, certain captured, non-US, rifles and pistols could still be imported as War Trophies up through the end of the Viet Nam.

DD Form 603-1 Jul 65

Since then, soldiers can no longer bring back firearms, functional or not. In fact, after 1995, even many knives and bayonets cannot be brought back as a war trophy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
46. "Access" to things is binary - Either you have it, or you don't
Regardless of how many hurdles you have to jump over to get something, either you CAN get it or you CAN'T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-09-09 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
56. It seems to many "easy access" = guns that haven't been banned.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC