Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Road rage incident on Rt. 302 leads to gun charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:15 PM
Original message
Road rage incident on Rt. 302 leads to gun charges
http://www.pressherald.com/news/Road-rage-incident-on-Route-302-leads-to-gun-charges.html

A Naples man faces charges of criminal threatening and having a loaded firearm in a vehicle after what authorities describe as a road rage incident in Casco Sunday.

Deputies with the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office arrested Matthew Martin, 38, shortly after the 5:35 p.m. incident on Route 302.

The alleged victims, a New Hampshire couple with their two 2-year-old sons in the car, told a deputy that a line of westbound traffic had pulled over to let pass a state trooper's cruiser with emergency lights. As cars pulled back into the roadway, a red Ford Excursion was unable to merge back into traffic right away, the New Hampshire couple told the deputy.

The Excursion drove up close behind the couple and when the man looked in his mirror, he says he saw the driver of the Excursion holding what looked like a shotgun out the window pointing toward the car, the sheriff's office said.

<more>
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lemme guess...
The NRA is somehow behind this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. So a guy does something illegal, and gets busted for it.
And in your view that provides evidence that all gun owners are murderous maniacs.

Do you also view sex offenders as a reason to ban consensual sex?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Umm... the OP quoted the news report without additional comment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And a most-positive one at that.
Go JPAK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Yeah, GO JPAK!
Who cares about statistics, lets just cheery pick out anecdotal evidence that supports our ignorant position and ignore the statistical realities! That's the way we go about it as progressives, right?!?!!......right?......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. A tireless history illuminating the folly of allowing guns and ammo loose in American society.
Edited on Tue May-31-11 03:23 PM by sharesunited
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Isn't it amazing that we have the longest lasting written constitution in the world ...
when you consider how foolish the founding fathers were to add the Bill of Rights and include the Second Amendment?

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. If they saw how callously the People are shooting each other, they would positively shit.
In any event, it was included in the BOR to appease skeptics of a strong federal government.

Subsequently tested and rendered obsolete by the Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Please explain how the Civil War made the Second Amendment obsolete ...
In the first place the Civil war was not an attempt to overthrow the government but was an attempt to separate from it.


The American Civil War is not a revolution, but a civil war. It was between two major political factions; in this case, one faction decided that it wanted to self-govern. It is classified as a civil war because (a) it was solely between citizens of one country (b) the point was political independence of one group, NOT the wholesale replacement of the national government for the entire country and (c) secession was a stated goal

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_a_revolution_and_a_civil_war#ixzz1NxyGE6KY



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Re: Please explain how the Civil War made the Second Amendment obsolete
:toast: Good one! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "If they saw how callously the People are shooting each other, they would positively shit."
You do realize you are talking about people in a day and age that would often settle matters of honor with a dual right? Kinda makes your above statement seem to be a bunch of BS you grabbed out of your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Duals are the reason for the Second Amendment?
One shot, hit or miss, with No Sanction In Law. Had to be conducted In Secret, and at the sufferance of society.

Compare to VA Tech, Fort Hood, Tucson. Envisioned by the Founders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. No, you have been told many times of why we have the 2A. Please don't play ignorant.
Duals were not conducted in secret. Perhaps you may recall a U.S. president that once had a dual on the White House lawn. If not you really need to bone up on your history.

My response of duals was in response to your ridiculous comment about our founders being appalled. They of course, would not. THEY understood why we needed the 2A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. To go to war with the police and the military? No you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ergot Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. With immense trepidation, I feel I should tell you, it's duel, not dual.
Forgive me, I'm anal retentive about English grammar and spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I recall the 13th amendment abolishing slavery but I don't recall anything that repealed the 2A.
Edited on Tue May-31-11 04:48 PM by Bold Lib
Could you cite that please? Oh, and the most recent 2A test before SCOTUS was what exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Heller and McDonald are the Plessey v. Ferguson of our time. Awaiting Brown v. Board of Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. How do you figure?
I always thought United States v. Cruikshank was more like Plessey v Ferguson and Heller was more like Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I can see why you might think that.
If you believe that empowering anyone to deprive anyone else of all their genuine Constitutional rights is somehow a triumph of freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gejohnston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. doesn't answer my question
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. So that's how you define freedom?
A society where every individual is too weak to hurt anybody else?



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. So you DO understand that the civil war did NOT abolish the 2A.
You just want it to be that way. Sorry, saying something over and over does not make it so.

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Are you trying to make a distinction between
express repeal and simply being overtaken by events (i.e. rendered moot)?

That is what is called a distinction without a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bold Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. You are the one saying that the 2A was made obsolete by the civil war.
Such is not the case in any way shape or fashion. You may wish it to be so, but it is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Billions of electrons
were peacefully going about their business until you diverted them to write that bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. You might be misusing more of them in an attempt to deflect the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Well I wont have to worry about
deflecting anything coming from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That it has lasted this long...
...is rather impressive. That it has been or is in the process of being modeled by over 90% of the 192 independent nations in the world speaks volumes.

Thomas Jefferson looked upon the Constitution as a standing monument and a permanent example for other peoples. "It is impossible," he wrote, "not to that we are acting for all mankind." President John Adams was convinced that American political ideas would profoundly affect other countries. Alexander Hamilton thought that it had been reserved to the American people to decide the question whether societies themselves are really capable of establishing good government. James Madison, president and contributor to the Federalist Papers, believed that posterity would be indebted to the Founding Fathers for their political achievement and for the sound governing principles provided for in the U.S. Constitution.

This information has been excerpted from an article by Albert Blaustein titled "THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: AMERICAS MOST IMPORTANT EXPORT". {Albert P. Blaustein was professor of law at Rutgers (The State University of New Jersey) School of Law. He authored numerous scholarly works on the subject of constitutionalism including a six-volume work on the U.S. Constitution entitled Constitution of Dependencies and Special Sovereignties. Blaustein helped draft more than 40 constitutions worldwide and visited many of those countries. In 1991, he helped to write the constitution for the Russian Republic. Professor Blaustein died in 1994.}
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. We should thank the Dutch.
They inspired a good portion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Without a doubt...
...ideologies from many cultures contributed to the US Constitution. There are great similarities between US laws and English common law. IIRC governing principles from the French, Dutch, German, English and numerous other societies were drawn on by the founding fathers. Principles as old as the ten commandments and the ideals of the Greeks and Romans. What the US founders formed was an elegant constitution.

It was unprecedented in brevity. Forming a well functioning and enduring government with a 100 page governing document is a formidable task. The wisdom and eloquence summoned to do that in less than 10 pages in nothing less than awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. As do you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Where did I say that? Clue - I did not say anything like that, so stop making shit up
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. So are you willing to say this person's criminal behavior does not reflect normal gun owners at all?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. SUV's kill people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Defense against some fool with road rage is one reason I carry a concealed weapon ...
I go out of my way to be a polite driver but it is always possible that I might do something that irritates another driver.

A co-worker who had a concealed weapons permit was driving to work for the graveyard shift one night when he managed to piss off another driver. Several miles down the road both cars stopped at a red light. My co-worker found himself pinned in with a car in front of him, one beside him and a deep ditch on his right. He glanced into his rear view mirror and saw the angry driver leaving his vehicle with a tire iron in his hand.

My co-worker drew a 9mm pistol and held it in his hand across the steering wheel. When the angry individual walked up to his driver's door he noticed the pistol, swore, and walked back to his vehicle. No shots were fired and the firearm was never pointed at anyone. Its presence stopped what might have turned into a really nasty situation.

My co-worker said that if he would have been able to simply drive away, he would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Stupid.
You realize all of the what if's that could have happened.

What if he missed and killed the 3 y/o in the car next to him, or in front of him?
What if the guy with the tire iron took his gun from him and used it against him?
What if the guy was just getting out of his car to look at a tire that was running low and was shot by your friend for doing nothing?
What if the guy in the car next to him was a cop and mistook him for a bad guy and shot him?
Etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. what if it prevented him getting a tire iron shampoo...???
Edited on Tue May-31-11 03:21 PM by ileus
safety first what if's later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. What is your suggestion for this guy? Wait until he hits you with the tire iron? n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sorry, should have included the sarcasm thingy...
Were there any more memes that I forgot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. LOL....sorry........
I knew you were very pro gun but guess I was in a serious mood. Sorry for having my sarcasm mode turned off. Funny post now that I am not clueless. But great job of imitating a anti!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. oops....my bad also...I apologize
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ergot Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. What if my grandma had 3 towels NEVER MIND
Edited on Tue May-31-11 07:30 PM by ergot
oops sorry didn't see the replies
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. Point?
Oh yeah, you didn't make one here either, just more drive-by news story spamming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
discntnt_irny_srcsm Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Possibly he could...
...switch to the handle "non_sequit@rd"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC