Good explanation of the historical background, but it fails to address the elephant in the room:
"Legislation must extend to all gun shows. The definition of gun show must cover all gun-related events and all sales at gun shows.
In order to be effective, the legislation must apply to all events at which guns are sold in any volume, such as gun shows, flea markets, or swap meets. The Lautenberg amendment contained compromise language that defined gun shows as events where "50 or more firearms are offered for sale, transfer, or exchange." A definition which allows the unregulated sale of more than 50 guns will open a loophole that could allow smaller gun shows to flourish and remain unregulated...."I encourage people to go to
http://thomas.loc.gov/ and search for the phrase "gun show". S.1807 is typical of the proposed legislation. In order to justify control over private transactions, any federal regulation that address gun show sales by unlicensed individuals needs a Constitutional basis otherwise it would not stand up to court challenges. Senator Lautenberg understands that fact, and the VPC has chosen to ignore the obvious need for a Constitutional basis. The VPC says 50 guns is too loose of a limit, but they don't say what their ideal limit would be. Ten guns? Two? One? At some point the legislation would become untenable. You can't define one person offering one gun for sale through a newspaper classified ad as a gun show. There has to be a reasonable floor limit, as Senator Lautenberg and others have proposed.
"...In addition, it is imperative that the definition of gun show ensure that transactions initiated at a gun show cannot be consummated off-premises with no background check required. The Lautenberg amendment mandated a background check if any part of a firearm transaction (including the offer for sale, transfer, or exchange) took place at a gun show. Criminals are sure to exploit a "let's step outside" loophole that would allow unscrupulous gun sellers to use gun shows as venues for arranging sales and then finalizing them off-site to avoid background checks."Give me a big "DUH!" on that one. Of course the VPC offers no suggestion for dealing with that obvious flaw in the "close the gun show loophole" strategy for making society safer. What do they want to do, have police follow everyone who attends a gun show to make sure they don't meet someone for coffee and a surreptitious gun sale on the way home? It's absurd.