Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congresswoman Waddles Into Israeli Spy Storm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:36 AM
Original message
Congresswoman Waddles Into Israeli Spy Storm
<snip>

"How many hot-buttons does the news that the NSA wiretapped Congresswoman Jane Harman involve? Let's count: 1) public corruption, 2) "Israel Lobby" espionage, 3) intelligence agencies spying on lawmakers and 4) Bush's hyper-politicization of everything.

The National Security Agency eavesdropped on a telephone conversation Harman had with a "suspected Israeli agent" in October 2005, in which Harman agreed to try to quash an investigation into an Israeli lobby.

At the time, the Justice Department was pursuing an espionage case against two lobbyists for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful Israeli lobbying group. According to CQ's Jeff Stein, the NSA was listening in on an Israeli operative's calls when they picked up a conversation between the target and Harman in which the congresswoman promised to "waddle in" to the AIPAC case "if you think it'll make a difference."

In exchange, Stein reports, the Israeli operative promised to use his (or her) influence to help Harman land the chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee. In October 2005, the Democrats were heavily favored to win the mid-term election; the wrangling for committee assignments had already begun, and Nancy Pelosi, who was expected to be named Speaker, was signaling that Harman was not a candidate for the Intelligence Committee.

This is the second report that the NSA was spying on members of Congress to come to light in recent weeks; last week the New York Times reported that the agency tried to tap the phone of an unidentified congressman in late 2005 or early 2006 (the tap never happened). The Harman wiretap, according to Stein, was approved by a court.

According to Stein, Harman ended the quid-pro-quo negotiation by saying, "This conversation doesn't exist."

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Waddles?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. her words n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmmm. "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, ..." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Disgraceful on so many levels beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gonzales blackmailed Harman to get her OK for warrantless searches
Since Obama released the torture memos, the lights have been on, and the cockroaches are on the run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaayecanaan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. The usual mediocre pusbucket...
Born wealthy, went to a wealthy school, straight into a staffing position after graduating, and bland and tasteless enough to hang around for seven straight congressional terms.

She also supports softcore denial of the Armenian genocide:-

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harman12oct12,0,3479203.story?coll=la-opinion-center

This will go nowhere, if anything the Democratic party is less likely to turn on its own. It would be good if the transcript could be leaked though. At least give people the opportunity to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaayecanaan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. from Salon.com
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/21/harman/

Overnight, the Blue Dog has been transformed from champion of the Lawless Surveillance State into a shrill advocate of investigations...

There's a blurb of her on MSNBC. She seems a bit more categorical in her denials and calls for the transcript of the conversation to be released, so maybe she is telling the truth. Still, the hypocrisy shines through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm waiting for the facts. Categorical is what you gotta do in her position.
They could have set her up, she could have asked for it. Meanwhile it's a great show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Talk about "hens coming home to roost"
yes Jane wiretap can mean you too, just cause you advocated it doesn't mean they won't do it you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaayecanaan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. She deserved to be absolutely castigated for that...
the hypocrisy is staggering. It would have been my first question right off the bat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC