Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Josh Marshall: Time to Face Reality - what Bibi wants is incompatible with Israeli & US security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 10:06 AM
Original message
Josh Marshall: Time to Face Reality - what Bibi wants is incompatible with Israeli & US security
Time to Face Reality

Josh Marshall | May 24, 2011, 10:10AM

Prime Minister Netanyahu doesn't want a two state solution. Period. End of story. Whether this is a principle of deeply held belief (probably) or just a desire not to see his coalition government fall (certainly) doesn't really matter. His clear aim is to perpetuate the status quo indefinitely -- something that is simply not compatible with Israel's security, America's security or the Palestinians need for a state.

This is hardly surprising for anyone who has followed the issue closely. But any remaining ambiguity is destructive in itself. His attack against a sitting American president for proposing the 1967 borders (which are actually the 1949 borders) with land swaps as the basis of negotiations is the final tell.

His policy is perpetual occupation. Time to accept that reality and draw the appropriate implications.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/05/time_to_face_reality.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is Congress cheering? . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. What makes anyone think the PA wants a peaceful 2 state solution?
They rejected the 2000-01 offer as well as another in 2008 that was similar to the Geneva Initiative.

Why'd they reject those 2 offers and opt for more war and misery for Palestinians?

They could have had a state free of occupation and settlements for the last 10 years. They could have avoided the Gaza 2008-09 war had they settled with Olmert.

There is not one single bit of evidence suggesting that the Palestinian leadership desires a peaceful 2 state outcome.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC