|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 06:43 AM Original message |
9/11 Video Shocks Sacramento Citizens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
1. Interesting......I haven't seen this flick showing around here (Texas). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 06:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Dunno about distribution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
77. I live in Texas too...and I damn sure have not heard of this...kept in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
3. Here is the website for the flick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. My question is, suppose those were some other planes or missiles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 07:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. yeah.........and all the lives on board? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keirsey (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 08:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:21 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. The FAA and Norad seemed to have a different agenda other than protecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Good question. And some things to add to the mix, perhaps: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
53. There are a few civil lawsuits over 9-11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nlighten1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
6. By the way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 08:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Thanks for the tip.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
41. And if you have a Bit Torrent client... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. does it come in a tin foil wrapper? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. No kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:28 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Not one person suggests they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Flight 93 landed in Cleveland??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I dunno, but here's the original report: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:36 AM Response to Reply #17 |
115. That was Delta 1989, not United 93. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Noodleboy13 (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
48. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
45. Yes indeed - these conspiracy theories are always wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. and not a single person who got on those scheduled flights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Hey dude - i was being sarcastic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:40 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. I don't have to explain shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #59 |
93. get to it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. And I love those of you who shame everyone into shutting up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Well, first off, if you had any answers to your questions it would be OUR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:11 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. Oh take a walk. I didn't parrot anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:15 PM Response to Reply #57 |
69. JEEEZO - doesn't anyone here get sarcasm?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:20 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. I got it Laura. Loved it* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ilovenicepeople (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:07 PM Response to Reply #47 |
85. By the sounds of it you were with the Fox news guy when he saw the plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
94. re:stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DulceDecorum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #47 |
114. Scheduled flights? Sez who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 01:28 PM Response to Reply #114 |
122. Sez the tickets that were sold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
58. They don't present a conspiracy theory. Just photographic evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:43 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Post it! Post it please! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
99. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
10. Not a commercial airliner? Meet Dov Zakheim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Analysis: Defense budget practices probed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Just one example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. logic to these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. That's exactly why they raise my ire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. I couldn't agree with you more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
97. and so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:45 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Strawman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:50 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. official line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Okee Doke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-15-04 10:46 AM Response to Reply #104 |
112. tell me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
44. You really have to frame the statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
96. proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #96 |
101. None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. re: plausibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. "gassed to death and buried in mass graves?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. re: gassed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:27 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Keep that head in the sand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. better sand than shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:52 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:50 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Let's look at what you just wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
36. I just don't have time to chase down silly rabbit holes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
55. If you find any more typical sloppy crap in the other 25 links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
64. Did PNAC get lucky, or "good"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. An opportunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. I don't know why your asking me that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:42 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Shorthand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. HFishbine you can have your "blatant distortion". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. I'll take the reast of your post on face value |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. You have no idea what I'm trying to imply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:56 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Tiresome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #89 |
95. What is tiresome is you clinging to a fact that I have already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:42 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. "I am not trying to imply anything." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. let's have some context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:36 PM Response to Reply #70 |
79. And this proves that a plan didn't hit the pentagon and that a remote cont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-17-04 08:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
113. Seems like he is wishing it pretty hard though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:08 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Blah Blah.... once again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
50. The gover-media could easily pull this off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tight_rope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
81. Don't be so shallow...just cause you don't see it doesn't mean it's not th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:42 AM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Scary Lookin' Feller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
32. Grand old profiteering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
65. Great.... yet another Likud spy working in the US government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
14. Road apples for shit eaters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedSock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #14 |
31. what happened to planes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:17 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. Why go through all the trouble? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Engine parts inside the pentagon???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:48 AM Response to Reply #56 |
117. What does that prove??? It proves an airplane crash (unless you're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
120. If you really want to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #51 |
106. too sloppy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:46 AM Response to Reply #31 |
116. Radar would see it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
30. Excuse me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
33. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
34. DoD Statement on Jack Shaw and the Iraq Telecommunications Contract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. The smear campaign against whistleblower Jack Shaw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
35. Winds of Change:Troubled Waters Ahead For the Neo Cons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:37 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Defense Official Probed on Contracts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Tracking weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Wolfowitz Approves New DTSA Under Feith September 6, 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 02:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
84. SO NOW IT IS PAYBACK TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
38. Sounds like a job for Snopes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
43. Does anyone know where Ewing (Nico) is posting these days? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
46. Does the video mention the Pentagon attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
62. If anyone had any doubt, it was gone by the end of the film |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
71. Yeah - i've seen pics of that small hole that the.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
90. "Very strong evidence for that." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
49. As his investigation expanded into the bowels of the Pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
63. Currently covering my aluminum veggie strainer with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:10 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. The people responding to the second aircraft claiming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Great point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:12 PM Response to Reply #66 |
91. What did the space shuttle impact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
73. You may be right about the diversion theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
92. So, let me see if I have this straight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 10:33 PM Response to Reply #92 |
110. I don't know why they used a missile on the pentagon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abe Linkman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-15-04 08:32 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Very good point. And, here's why a missile was used at Pentagon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:59 AM Response to Reply #111 |
119. If that bears ANY merit, why not just fire the missile from a 757? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whipzz (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #73 |
108. weak claim? Gotta be joking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 12:50 AM Response to Reply #73 |
118. Laura, have you seen this report? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 01:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
121. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodewd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 04:28 PM Response to Reply #63 |
107. pod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
74. I am intrigued, but still don't know what to believe...HOWEVER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:28 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Again, great point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura_B_manslaughter (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-14-04 01:31 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. That's especially true regarding WTC7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carlvs (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #78 |
123. Wrong!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carlvs (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-18-04 08:01 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. Oops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flying Coyote (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. That would be nice to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC