I´ve just finished reading another play based on 911.
http://911teachin.net/CHENEY%20ON%20911.htm ( 35 pages in print out )
This play is pointing the finger at Cheney ( Title : "J´accuse Cheney" ), but unlike Ruppert, they don´t think Cheney was in control of what happened. Their theory is that Cheneys scheme, which was considerably less bloody, was taken over, by forces behind the scene.
One thing I found particulary interesting, was this quote from the post script :
" Where it is matters, this story is basically true, as far as exposing the lengths Cheney was willing to go to to avoid explaining why he--and no one else--knew that it was Flight 77 that was headed for Washington, and why he was so sure it must be shot down--but then he refused to explain why. "
Is this a conclusion that they have reached from available sources? Or must this - if it is not pure speculation - have come from inside sources? ( The authors do give the appearance of having inside sources. )