The Dumbest, Yet Most Widely Accepted 9/11 Conspiracy Theory: EXPOSED

[veracity]

http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/editorial/jesse-richards-commentary/8120-the-dumbest-yet-most-widely-accepted-911-conspiracy-theory-exposed.html

VIDEO:
The Dumbest, Yet Most Widely Accepted 9/11 Conspiracy Theory: EXPOSED

Please take a few minutes as the editor of http://tvnewslies.org points out a few small aspects of the silliest, yet most widely accepted 9/11 conspiracy theory to date.

He points out two aspects of this ridiculous theory and exposes the people responsible for creating it. Jesse Richard encourages people will do their own research and realize how this one party is responsible for the most widely believed, yet easily debunked 9/11 conspiracy theory to date.

Please watch this until the end where he exposes who is responsible for this laughable theory.

With all the time that passed, and all the opportunity for people to research these claims on their own, it is astonishing how many people still fall for the most popular 9/11 conspiracy "THEORY" out there.

Please...watch this until the end...

[jberryhill]

1. If you cared about the truth

Then instead of some gimmicky come-on, you would state what you believe the truth to be, and your reasons for it.

Does "truth" really require this sort of chicanery?

[William Seger]

2. Well, that was a waste of time

Maybe you can fill in the part of the argument that Richards seems to have forgotten to mention, or perhaps clarify what he's trying to do if not make an argument. How does either of the two things he talks about contradict the "official conspiracy theory" that 19 Arab radicals committed the 9/11 attack with hijacked planes? Or does he accept that part of the "official conspiracy theory" and have some alternate theory about -- what? He forgot to mention that, too.

[Theobald]

3. Which of the theories are you trying to debunk.

He never clearly states what he is trying to say, but it seems to me that he is stating that Atta et al did not hijack the planes, is that correct?

[William Seger]

4. Oddly, that's not even consistent

If Atta didn't hijack the plane, what is the significance of the $100,000 he received? Beats me, and Richard wasn't any help with that, either.

[Theobald]

5. I was trying to stay away from the really confusting part

and just stick to the confusing part. If I got my first, relatively simple question, answered, I was going to then delve into the more confusing aspects of the video. For instance if he is actually saying that it is implausible that the hijackers took off from Portland to make a connecting flight in Boston, than what significance would the next 'fact' have; that the 9/11 commission is covering up the 100,000 dollar payment from Pakistani ISI to Atta.

[Ohio Joe]

6. Sorry, I lost interest

After reading here, reading at the link, listening to the huckster talk (after reading it twice), I lost interest in whatever he might have had to say. If he has some relevant point, he should make it and not keep hiding it in his really lame presentation.

[whatchamacallit]

7. Even I thought that was crap

He's right about the money though. Rule #1: follow the money. Unfortunately, the "Commish" was empaneled to make the truth go bye bye, not to find it. Kean's pathetic excuse; "the attacks were so cheap, their funding was irrelevant", is mind boggling. It's insane subterfuge like that that keeps CTers doubting official stories.

[Theobald]

8. Come on Veracity

You proffered this information, yet you don't seem to want to defend it or even discuss it.

[Theobald]

9. She's keeping me waiting.....

Veracity means habitual observance of truth in speech and statement and yet our veracity can not defend what she has proffered.