Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We have only 4 Dem senators left in the south? Who's vulnerable in '06

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:26 PM
Original message
We have only 4 Dem senators left in the south? Who's vulnerable in '06
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 04:52 PM by fujiyama
I can think of only the following:

Blanche Lincoln of AR (She won reelection easilly)
Mary Landriu of LA (won by a thin margin in a runoff in '02.)
Nelson of FL (he's up for reelection in '06. It'll be a tough fight)

Is that it? Other than Lincoln the other two will be facing tough fights in 2 and 4 years respectively.

What strategy is in place to stop these losses? Not only that but we have several vulnerable senators in the upper midwest. I heard that Dayton will have a tough fight, as will Cantwell, and possibly Stabenow.

Can you name the others vulnerable in '06?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. No point worrying about it until we assure legitimate elections
All the strategy in the world won't help until then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UNIXcock Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Your post almost sounds like a concession ...
... the last thing we should be doing is discouraging activism and scaring potential democratic voters from the polls "because every election is rigged" - not smart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Not a concession at all. Pretending we have fair elections = concession
Until we recognize the problem and fix it, we are giving the power over to the guys rigging the votes and going along with the pretense.

I fight like hell, but choose my battles. The one which will save America is the one which will restore power to those we actually elect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. We need to worry about both
Yes, there are problems with voter fraud, at least to some extent. But the fact is that we've had several candidates loose in landslide margins before Diebold controlled the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obviousman Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's look at it this way
Once the dems realize they have hit absolute rock bottom in the south, they can only go up right? i mean, will it honestly take the taunting of the republicans that we are a "regional party" for this party to get moving?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pryor is a Dem Senator in Arkansas
& if you count West Va, Byrd & Rockefeller.

Once they are incumbents, many are safe. Much harder to win an open seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
west michigan Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Byrd ?
How old is he? 84ish? Any which way I do not see him retiring. I think he will run again ...still sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. He's 87 now.
If he retires I'm sure he could help a Democrat a lot who runs for his seat. If he runs for re-election he'd probably win with the only concern being he's very old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I don't see Byrd serving another term
He'll either be retired or lose his next election. I hope he retires. He reminds me of Bill Roth. Older with a similar malady. Surprise loss to a good candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Do you think he could lose?
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 10:00 PM by fujiyama
WV has been really trending republican in recent years. Bush won the state by 13 points.

Byrd himself is an institution in that state. I personally think he'd still win it pretty easilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Ah I forgot
that AR has two dem senators.

West Virginia will be very tough when Byrd retires. As you said we have a better chance once they are an incumbent. Of course, that didn't matter in Daschle's case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. We will lose 5 to 7 Senate seats in 2006 if the DLC continues driving
the agenda of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
west michigan Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Stabenow in Mi
We have her coming up in 06 along with Granholm. She knocked off spence abraham in a tight race in 00. I see the right thinking that both of them might be considered vulnerable in 06. Michigan economy is not the greatest and they will certainly try to blame this on the Gov. Did not help starting out 2 billion in the hole after engler(R) though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about the other way around?
How many Republican senators are left in the Northeast? Snowe, Collins, Chaffee, Specter, Santorum, Gregg, and Sununu. Snowe, Collins, Specter, and Chaffee are all moderates. Santorum is very vulnerable. And look at the other Dem areas like the left coast and Great Lake States. The only Republicans there are Gordon Smith of Oregon and Norm Coleman of Minnesota. It's clear that in places like this Republicans have nothing. The NY and Illinois state GOP's are a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The moderate Republicans are the ones we need to go after
Emulate the Republican strategy. They have been picking off vulnerable red state Democrats for years. It's time to turn that strategy around on them. We learned in this last election that large amounts of cash can be raised through the internet. Money is what makes a candidate viable. It's what keeps the DLC in the saddle. To a large degree they control the flow of money, which in turn determines who is able to run for office. The fund raising power of the net changes that. Sites like this one can get behind a candidate and jump start a campaign with infusions of cash. I would be prepared to pay to see Santorum taken down, but we also need strong candidates to run against Snowe, Collins, Chafee and other so-called liberal Republicans who vote for the likes of Trent Lott or Bill Frist for majority leader. That veneer of liberalism they wear is mere camoflage. They are not our friends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Amen
If they aren't going to switch parties, they can find new careers. Target them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. It is unconscionable that Republicans have seats in OUR territory
if the Democrats really wanted to, there is no doubt that they could take those offices. Surely a truly progressive candidate could decimate those so-called moderate Republicans?

And Santorum has really got to go. I don't live up there, but I would gladly donate to any campaign that would knock that guy out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Conrad of North Dakota top of the GOP hit list
He and his staff where awesome yesterday.


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_11_21.php#004080

11-21-04

It's worth noting that the "Istook Amendment" (see the last post about the technical issue of whether it's an 'amendment' or a 'provision') was discovered in the appropriations bill by a staffer for North Dakota's Kent Conrad. And Conrad is right at the top of the list of senators the GOP is going to try to knock out in 2006.

That, presumably, will clear the way for other middle-of-the-night Istook Amendments.--Josh Marshall

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. My most vulnerables are
Byrd in West Virginia, Dayton in Minnesota for the Democrats. Santorum for the Republicans.

Dayton wouldn't be as vulnerable except for the closing his office in Washington because of terrorism fears. That's going to come back to haunt him in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Why do you think Byrd is vulnerable?
The guy is practically a god in West Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. When Byrd retires, do you think another Democrat would take his place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I honestly don't know
But if West Virginians can continue to embrace a Democrat who vocally opposed and voted against the IWR, and has fought Bush every step of the way, surely there is still hope.

Men like him and Feingold and others seem to indicate that outspoken Democrats can prosper, even in states where this would seem unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. It will be a tough 50-50
open seat race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. If Byrd runs again
I think he'd win.

But if it's an open seat I'd definetely give the republicans the advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I think Byrd is vulnerable because he will be
88 or 89 years old when his reelection comes up.

He also is afflicted with Parkinson's Disease which is degenerative in nature. He already shakes when he stands or speaks.

I believe that two years from now it will be quite a bit worse than it is now.

I believe that there's a real chance that he will shock many voters with his appearance by next election time. He may have to run a Strom Thurmond like campaign where the candidate can't appear in public.

This worked for Thurmond because South Carolina was such an overwhelmingly Republican state. I don't believe it would work anymore for Senator Byrd in West Virginia.

I think the more apt analogy would be Senator Roth of Delaware (of Roth IRA fame). He was in his 70's (I think) and also had Parkinson's (I think). The Delaware Democratic Party found a strong candidate to put against him, and he was forced to actually campaign.

He fell off his tool during a debate and that was it for Senator Roth. A sad end.

I hope Senator Byrd retires. We don't need 94 year olds in the senate.

Then again, maybe I'm wrong and he'll be a healthy 89 years old senator coming off another easy win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreadneck Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sam Nunn, where are you?
Georgia's former senator, Sam Nunn, is exactly the kind of Democrat who can win in the South. Sadly, he's left public life, absolutely disgusted by the tone and tactics in DC.

Sam, where are ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. MI Reps are scraping the bottom of the barrel looking for an opponent for
Debbie Stabenow. They're talking about Betsy DeVos and Spence Abraham's wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
west michigan Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. heard she stepped down...
...from her chairmanship a few weeks ago? devos. if so then will devos shoot for gov or senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Ah I didn't know who they were looking at
I think both Granholm and Stabenow have the advantage.

I heard the republicans making some noise, saying that more people voted for Bush than for Granholm.

I don't think they'll win it, but then again the state was a lot closer than I expected...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC