Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What other dems besides Clark have said Alberto Gonzales is unfit for AG?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:34 PM
Original message
What other dems besides Clark have said Alberto Gonzales is unfit for AG?
I'm sure Boxer will speak up against this outrage. Any others in the senate? Kerry seems to be taking a principled stance on unfit nominees lately.

Let me ask you about Alberto Gonzales, the president‘s counsel. He‘s up for—the president has put him up for attorney general. He‘s the man that laid out the guidelines, if you would call them guidelines, on torture of prisoners and the power of the presidency during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Do you think he‘s fit for the job?

CLARK: No.

How can the American people have confidence in a man like Gonzales after what he‘s written for the president of the United States? He‘s basically said the Geneva Convention was irrelevant. He basically said that torture is something that‘s very limited, that you could be in terrible pain and that you still wouldn‘t be being tortured.

MATTHEWS: Yes. He said we could have cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of prisoners.

CLARK: And not have it be torture.

MATTHEWS: Right.

CLARK: And Mr. Gonzales has basically said the power of the presidency is unlimited and he can do anything he wants.

How can we feel confident as Americans that we‘re living under the rule of law when the attorney general has violated what we believe to be the law?

MATTHEWS: Well, let‘s just get this straight, so we don‘t sound like we‘re goody-two-shoes here. You‘re a military man. You‘ve commanded troops, many of them. You‘ve been in combat in Europe. What are the limits of interrogation, as you understand it to be?

CLARK: Geneva Convention, no question about it.

I mean, we would never have violated the Geneva Convention. You don‘t shoot prisoners. You don‘t do false—trick executions. You don‘t rough them up and beat them up.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Did we threaten to throw people out of helicopters in Vietnam?

CLARK: I have heard those rumors. I never saw it. And if it was ever done, I hope it was punished.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Did we hose people with hoses in their mouths until they talked?

CLARK: Not in any of my commands that I know of.

MATTHEWS: Yes.

CLARK: And I‘ll tell you this.

In 1999, when we had three Americans captured by the Serbs at the start of the Kosovo campaign, they were put on television and one of them had a big black eye and looked like he was beaten up. We were outraged.

MATTHEWS: Right.

CLARK: And...

MATTHEWS: So you don‘t think water-boarding, as it‘s called, where you basically threaten a guy with drowning, you make him think he‘s going to drown, is acceptable?

(CROSSTALK)

CLARK: Absolutely not.

MATTHEWS: So Gonzales is not your man.

CLARK: I think strict Geneva Convention, strict adherence to the law.

MATTHEWS: Thank you.

CLARK: We put that law in place to protect our soldiers.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: You can‘t officially do it anymore, but—you‘re retired. But do you think a lot of military men of your rank, flag rank, do you think that‘s a common view? McCaffrey certainly had it last night. Is this a general view you hear from military men?

CLARK: This is what we believe in.

We—look, we fought for the Geneva Convention. It was put in place to protect our soldiers, our values and our institutions.

MATTHEWS: Right.

CLARK: We can‘t win the war on terror if we give up what we stand for as the American people.

MATTHEWS: Would you testify against Gonzales on the Hill if they asked you?

CLARK: Well, I would testify against anybody who wrote those kinds of things. I don‘t know Gonzales personally. But how he could have written these documents is outrageous.

MATTHEWS: Strong words. Thank you, Wesley Clark.

You going to run for president again?

CLARK: Rule nothing out.

MATTHEWS: I love it.

Anyway, thank you very much, General Wesley Clark, still in the mix.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6790643/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for that post!!
The General! On it as usual...So glad to hear him say what we all feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't think he's ever said a thing I didn't agree with. Yeah, Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's my man
Indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sopianae Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Go Wes!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MontecitoDem Donating Member (542 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great words
Thank you for posting this; I missed the interview. I'm so glad he is staying in the mix!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. By the time I was able to vote in the primaries...........
Clark was already out of the picture, but b4 that I was leaning his way but not a definite. The main question I had about him at the time, was about him being a military person. I have always been a pacifist and abhor violence as the means to any end. The military to me means war, killing, maiming and other atrocities. I had a hard time: liking the man as a person, but not liking his career choice.

But when choices were taken away and Kerry was the presumptive nominee, I got behind him and did my best to convince others to do the same.

My hope for the future is that Clark and others like him (military backgrounds notwithstanding) will continue to speak up for what they believe is wrong with *'s administration and hope that the MSM will pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wes Clark is the best Democrat, as George McGovern said
I saw this interview and he was so deadly serious about his dislike for Gonzales
that it made me respect him even more than I already did.

He didn't have to speak so plainly.

Yet he did.

He's no politician; he's a STATESMAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. "..he's a STATESMAN."
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 10:54 AM by mcscajun
you said it! That's what drew me to his candidacy in the first place. Plus — He's "old school" where it counts, and up-to-date where it matters.

I hadn't heard about the McGovern comment, but that just puts the icing on the cake for me. My first vote in a presidential election was cast for McGovern. :)

Clark in '08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kudos to Clark. Good comments!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Clark's looking better and better. Now just get him to take a stand
against depleted uranium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Working on it....
It won't be long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. He certainly didn't hesitate....
Torture by any other name is still torture....Mr. Gonzales!

and God don't like ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hopefully, some senators will get the idea. he set the trend.
Like he did with W's 911 responsibility,, revealing PNAC, the preemption, the GOP "mean machine" , no taxes for families up to 50K income, not avoiding the "liberal' label etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC