Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have only one point (question/ criticism) to make regarding the MSM.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:37 PM
Original message
I have only one point (question/ criticism) to make regarding the MSM.
Why are some of them beginning to sound the alarm regarding Chimpy McFart after they all worked so diligently to coverup his ass, hide the dangers inherent in his power grab, sing his praises as a demi-god, but now, after they accomplished all of that, now they find it is time to ... o, time to freak out, the SOB is a dangerous warmongering criminal, some of them are beginning to say. They knew it all along. So, why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Slow news week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you have any specifics to share?
I don't have the stomach to watch any of the news programs, so any dissent from the corporate media is news to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. some earlier posts here today had links to oped pieces by
peggy noonan, howard fineman and most recenly a post with a link to a maureen dowd oped ..... they all seem to be freaked out at chimpy mcfart's warmongering speech. ( I don't have the links to either of the three articles.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's okay; I just wanted direction in seeking out some information. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Link to articles
Posted this earlier today -provoides links to Noonan, etc. articles and talks about TV pundits:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1519184&mesg_id=1519184
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobweaver Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Controversy generates viewers. Viewers generate advertising $$$$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivan Sputnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because the election is over.
They didn't want to be accused of trying to influence the outcome. They are usually tougher on second-term presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Usually"? There is no usually. They are bought and paid by RNC
see this WaPo interview:
The Post: You used partial privatization yourself last year, sir.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes?
The Post: Yes, three times in one sentence. We had to figure this out, because we're in an argument with the RNC about how we should actually word this.

Occasionally, after elections, RNC leaves a leash a bit longer, as image at this point is irrelevant - they control EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC