Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buck up, Dean folks. Kerry was declared "finished" for months

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:22 AM
Original message
Buck up, Dean folks. Kerry was declared "finished" for months
See how the popular conceptions of the race can shift? How ironic does a toon like this look now?



The pundits know ZERO, they are paid to fill up time with worthless horse race prognostications and ill-informed assumptions as to "what voters want". They will comment on clothes, negativity and form personality caricatures because it's what they're paid to do. Wolf Blitzer, Judy Woodruff and Paula Zahn like Bush, and they want him elected. That's just CNN--this is true for about 90% of cable news coverage.

There were pundits in newspapers who, from start to finish, for twenty months, worked on the "phony Gore". There were columnists who injected that concept into virtually EVERY article they did on the campaign--the WP's Ceci Connolly, for example.

The media bias is something we just have to deal with. Dean made a HUGE mistake in giving the media a gift-wrapped video that gives credence to all their assertions about "the angry candidate". It would be like Kerry hosting a caviar brunch with NH bluebloods to kick off his primary campaign, or Edwards shaking a baby rattle during a speech.

But Kerry came back from being a "go-nowhere campaign-firing Brahmin with $200 hair" to winning Iowa, and Dean can make a similar comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton .....
placed fourth in the Iowa primary in 92'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clinton was never polling way ahead of the pack before Iowa either-
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 09:30 AM by Beaker
so comparing Dean's performance to his isn't really fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I thought it was 3rd
I had heard (and believe I saw while researching the caucus) that Dean placed 3rd in Iowa. If so, I'd say an IA 3rd is a pretty good omen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. the BIG and IMPORTANT difference-
Dean was doing well before any voters actually had their say.

now is when it starts to really count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You are correct - Clinton was way down BEFORE
the Iowa caucus - he was in single digits the beginning of January - his numbers didn't fall - they rose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. I heard "Kerry's lackluster campaign is finished" for months, and...
... we know now how all of that summed up to a big, fat nothing. I guess it shows that...

All you need is heart
Miles and miles and miles of heart
When they say that
You'll never win
Thats when the grin
Should start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC