Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today Show/Guckert video from Crooks and Liars- link

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:21 PM
Original message
Today Show/Guckert video from Crooks and Liars- link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...and that's how I gained... entry..."
hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Notice the new emphasis he puts on
the White House; 'they let me come' he says he asked and its their falt they let me in ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Question?
This piece says they only do a criminal background check for a day pass --- what is tax evasion? Wouldn't that have shown up? Maybe it's just a civil matter? Does this mean the 9/11 terrorists could have just gotten into the WH with a phony news site? They didn't have a criminal conviction in their backgrounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw her interview
and thought it was a puff piece that skimmed the unavoidable, but totally ignored the larger issues involved in this mess: Who let him in? How did he get a Day Pass for two years? What was an ex-military male prostitute doing in the WH pretending to be a journalist? (I think it's ironic that for as much as the repugs claim to looooooove and support the troops, they don't get even a little worked up that someone could bring such "shame and dishonor" to the military with the names of his web sites, all the while using his Marine background in his bio) What are the security implications? How does he figure into the Plame case?

When interviewed, he answers the generally softball question with vagueness and then there isn't much follow-up to speak of. The interviewers seem to take him at his word.

I think of the numerous Congressional investigations and hearings into the Vince Foster death, as though the fate of the country depended on the finding out the "truth" - which was already obvious from the beginning - and I can't believe that THIS story is being so underreported and treated so lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC