Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US draws up list of unstable countries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:35 PM
Original message
US draws up list of unstable countries
Edited on Tue Mar-29-05 09:00 PM by whirlygigspin
"US intelligence services are drawing up a secret watch-list of 25 countries in which instability might lead to US intervention, according to officials in charge of a new office set up to co-ordinate planning for nation-building and conflict prevention."

..."Mr Pascual told a conference last week on reconstructing and stabilising war-torn states that the NIC would identify countries of “greatest instability and risk” to clarify priorities and allocate resources. The watch-list was classified, according to a spokesperson. However, another official gave the example of Nepal, saying it was the subject of a study on fragile states by USAid, the government aid agency. USAid declined to comment."

By Guy Dinmore in Washington
Published: March 28 2005 21:56 | Last updated: March 28 2005 21:56
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/da4ba358-9fc7-11d9-b355-00000e2511c8.html

http://www.usaid.gov/policy/2005_fragile_states_strategy.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The way * is dividing this nation, we should definetly be on the list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes. It takes one to know one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can fight a war on 25 fronts.
Sure we can.

Yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:38 PM
Original message
Oh wow, 25 future wars we can all look forward to....
...let's watch those Halliburton and military blue-chip stocks rise to new heights:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Add the United States of Halliburton to the top of the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ha! 25! That's more than our coalition of the willing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. WE'RE # 1 !!! WE'RE # 1 !!!
And that's why it is secret and classified :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. IMO most of the 25 are on this list, sorted by billions of barrels
of oil reserves. From http://www.fpif.org/papers/oil.html :

Saudi Aramco 261.8
INOC (Iraq) 112.5
KPC (Kuwait) 96.5

NIOC (Iran) 89.7
PDV (Venezuela) 77.7
ADNOC (United Arab Emirates) 53.8

Pemex (Mexico) 28.3
NOC (Libya) 23.6
Lukoil (Russia) 14.3

NNPC (Nigeria) 13.5
ExxonMobil (U.S.) 12.2
PetroChina 11.0

Royal Dutch/Shell (UK/Netherlands) 9.8
British Petroleum 7.6
TotalFinaElf (France) 7.0

ChevronTexaco (U.S.) 8.5
Petrobras (Brazil) 8.4
Sinopec (China) 3.0

Nippon Mitsubishi (Japan) 0.05

WORLD 1,046.2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't Bush have a list of 64 he wanted to invade when he gave the
speech at West Point I think it was several years ago.

So, any guesses where we're going to get the military personnel for this policy? How long will most Americans put up with this crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC