Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush survives his Pres. until 08, could he be charged with any crimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:29 AM
Original message
If Bush survives his Pres. until 08, could he be charged with any crimes
when he leaves office? I was just wondering if he had some type of immunity after his Presidency. I cannot imagine that his lies/crimes won't catch up to him during his lifetime. As President, he can be impeached, forced to resign.... but what about afterwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. will he NOT be charged with crimes?
Does the Statute of Limitations on war crimes run out as soon as he leaves the WH?

Like Kissenger, the BushCo will, at best, not be able to leave the states, IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was wondering if he would be "exiled" in order to avoid prosecution
I was also wondering if there were some special protections against criminal prosecution built in for the President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. heh heh... my question in response was rhetorical
as in: how could he NOT be charged? :-)


There are no special protections built in (internationally speaking) for people who commit war crimes, even if it's the pResident of Jeebusland.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Could he claim diplomatic immunity in another country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. he can claim immunity right here in the states
that wouldn't make a difference, if war crimes charges are brought. Mind you, he'll probably never be tried, he just won't leave the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Ford pardoned Nixon for all crimes he may have committed
This was after Nixon resigned. This was a politically costly thing for Ford to do, so I'm sure there must have been a likelihood that he could have been charged with something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. No. Because what cannot be conceived cannot be understood.
Nobody in Washington seems to be able to conceive the damage and the criminal nature of Bush and his Administration. At least, nobody in the Democratic Party seems able to comprehend the nature and extent of his crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. in theory, there's no immunity
however, it's remarkably difficult, both politically and practically, to actually prosecute a former president.

among the difficulties are finding an unbiased jury and willing witnesses -- bush surrounds himself only with the most loyal.

generally, a former president cannot be prosecuted for "official acts", but if he did something he didn't actually have the official power to do, that would be possible, again, in theory.

best bets for actual prosecutions would be such clearcut things as bribery and obstruction of justice.

i VERY much doubt that shrub will be prosecuted, for many reasons.

sad, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not a lawyer or anything
but I think that all US officials are subject to the torture act without exception. There's little doubt that the law has been broken, and from the various memos it is clear that they new they might be subject to the law some time in the future. If one can show that Bush ordered/sanctioned it, well, then I guess where there is a will there is a way.

Is there the will? Frankly, I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. What about illegaly seizing the power to take us to war
through executive order he took us to war, not with an act of congress which is required under the constitution. This alone is an act of treason, Gore outlined these charges in a speech a couple of years ago, but nobody listened. According to our constitution he should be strung up from the cherry tree in the south lawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Seizing Power
Think you can make just as strong a case against President Truman for making war in Korea without a declaration issued by Congress. Also, think President Johnson made war in Vietnam without a congressional Declaration of War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
borg5575 Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. The Clinton also broke the law when we went into Kosovo.
Presidents take us to war all the time without an act of Congress. Both Democrats and Republicans have been very good at this in the past.

I'm not saying it's right. Personally, I opposed Bush's intervention in Iraq, but then I opposed Clinton's intervention in the Balkans too for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Unlikely while Repubs are in power- someone has to
BRING the charges and prosecute them. And most crimes do have statutes of limitations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. Saints are exempt from prosecution, and Bush claims he was
secretly canonized by the Pope during his last visit. He claims the ceremony occurred in a hidden room behind the Pope's living quarters and that the Pope "musta kept it quiet cause he was old and stuff," the President added.

Full story BREAKING in DU's Lounge:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x3029385
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Uhhhhh.... the Pope was dead, didn't he know that?
Or is he claiming that the Pope canonized him from Heaven?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Does Brain dead count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Extremely unlikely
The chance of Bush ever being charged with a crime are virtually nil. I know it's fun to dream about it -- just as the Republicans fantasized about President Clinton being led away from the White House in shackles -- but it's not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. He can, but he won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC