http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=04-08-05&storyID=21125<snip>
And when there have been articles about Oakland’s problems, at least recently, they manage to put Mr. Brown in the position of the exasperated father who cannot understand why the teenagers have not gone to sleep after he has repeatedly gone up to their room and urged them to do so. In an article this week on reports of Oakland’s 52 percent public school dropout rate, reporter Nanette Asimov of the Chronicle writes: “It’s astounding and unconscionable,” said Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown. “It’s a crisis that’s been going on for decades. Oakland is trying hard. They need money. They need leadership. It’s quite daunting, and it’s going to require a lot more truth-telling and honesty than has been forthcoming in recent decades.”
They?
What Ms. Asimov appears to have missed is that for the past five years, since Oakland voters passed Measure D, Mr. Brown has had the privilege of appointing three members to join the seven elected members of the board of directors of the Oakland Unified School District, making him by far the most powerful individual shareholder of that institution (if OUSD were a football team, Mr. Brown would be Al Davis). A fair reading of recent Oakland history might be that before Mr. Brown came on the scene, Oakland schools were solvent and making slow, but steady, progress. After Mr. Brown won the right to make 30 percent of the school board appointments in 2000, the Oakland school system virtually collapsed, went into state receivership, and students and parents are streaming out by the busload. Unconscionable? Yes, indeed. There is an irony there that, apparently, most of our news outlets have not caught.
Other low points of the Brown administration?
If you’re talking development, you might look at the fact that while obsessing with downtown for six years, Mr. Brown has failed to understand where Oakland’s commercial potential actually lies. Oakland has a series of marvelously successful local commercial districts that could have used the “star power” and push that Brown gave to his 10k plan: Piedmont and College Avenues, Grand Avenue and Lakeshore, Montclair Village, Fruitvale, the Laurel District, and Chinatown come immediately to mind (we’ll return to Chinatown in a moment). Meantime, commercial centers like the Jack London Gateway Shopping Center (formerly the Acorn Shopping Center) in West Oakland and the Foothill Center in East Oakland are hanging on, but suffering from neglect (Foothill just announced its losing its anchor supermarket, Albertsons).
Even if you’re talking about downtown development, Mr. Brown’s vision appears to have looked the wrong way. He has focused on uptown, helping to win city subsidies for the Forest City project which is (again) slated to attract a lot of “new” residents into Oakland. Meanwhile Chinatown, which long ago figured out a way to successfully mix commercial and residential in downtown Oakland, gets little official attention or notice. A better plan for the last six years than the uptown dream might have been a project to link lower downtown past the Civic Center with Chinatown and the Jack London Square area, figuring out a way to move the depressed and depressing public buildings (jail, police station, coroner’s office, et. al) in between to another location nearer to the judicial center around the Alameda County Courthouse on Fallon.