Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry: No single reason why Bolton is a bad choice...there are several.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:10 PM
Original message
Kerry: No single reason why Bolton is a bad choice...there are several.
http://kerry.senate.gov/v3/cfm/record.cfm?id=236243

Press Release of Senator Kerry
Statement by John Kerry on John Bolton’s Nomination as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

Below is a statement from Senator John Kerry on today’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings on the appointment of John R. Bolton to serve as the new U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations:

Monday, April 11, 2005

“John Bolton is the wrong choice to serve as America’s voice at the United Nations.

“Mr. Bolton’s diplomatic tin ear and penchant for hostile rhetoric have hurt America’s interests. As the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, Mr. Bolton was responsible for halting the spread of weapons of mass destruction, yet he achieved little in the way of either arms control or international security. America secured more nuclear material in the two years before September 11th than in the two years after. On his watch, North Korea and Iran have become burgeoning nuclear states, with North Korea’s nuclear arsenal quadrupling from two warheads to eight today. His inability or refusal to resolve a liability question with the Russians has left enough plutonium for thousands of weapons virtually unsecured.

“New reports that Mr. Bolton attempted to intimidate intelligence analysts who did not share his views are deeply disturbing. Given our recent tragic experience with intelligence failures, it’s clear we cannot afford more of the same.

“There is no single reason why John Bolton is a bad choice to represent the United States at the U.N. -- there are several. If his past is any indication of the future, John Bolton is ill-suited to be our representative to the United Nations. His hostility to the U.N. itself makes him an unlikely person to lead the strong alliances the White House now says we need to address our common threats.”

:yourock:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just another indication
of Kerry's impeccable taste.

He really hates this guy. And for a million good reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Appreciate this post.
Senator Kerry has it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are so right, Mr. Kerry.
Look at his writings - what he has had published; he's the last person we want as our rep. in the U.N.

I'll try to find a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. What does anyone wager that Bush and the republican majority
...will ram-rod the John Bolton appointment through for an unchallenged vote. They seem to have enough democratic votes to prevent a filibuster by democrats. I'm concerned because this appointment would pave the way for Bush to neutralize world voices in opposition to his foreign war adventures and in effect eliminate the UN as a world body for maintaining peace and stability.

I think our democrats at the hearing today have asked most of these questions:

<snip>

Questions for John Bolton at his Confirmation Hearing
April 4, 2005

Q: The United Nations Charter defines the organization’s most fundamental purpose as saving “succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” Do you share this priority?
Bolton advocates the use of military force to overthrow the governments of North Korea, Syria, and Iran and argues for the US to have unrestricted “discretion in using force to advance its national interests.” 1 Bolton was a hard-line supporter of the 1980s Nicaraguan Contra War, the 1991 Gulf War, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He fought for the US to withdraw from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and for the revival of the "Star Wars" missile system. He sabotaged a 2001 UN bio-weapons conference, and referred to supporters of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (including over 80 percent of the US public) as "misguided individuals following a timid and neo-pacifist line of thought." 2

Q: How do you propose to resolve armed conflicts raging in Colombia, Sudan, Congo, and other places where weapons sold by US arms dealers are the primary instruments of killing?
Bolton virulently opposes any limits on civilian access to weapons and international restrictions on small-arms trade, landmines, biological weapons, child soldiers, and nuclear-weapons testing. Bolton is categorically opposed to any US peacekeeping missions.

Q: Do you believe that the United States is exempt from international law?
Bolton has said: "It is a big mistake for us to grant any validity to international law even when it may seem in our short-term interest to do so, because over the long term, the goal of those who think that international law really means anything are those who want to constrict the United States." 3

Q: As Ambassador to the United Nations, what approach would you take to working with other countries to solve international problems?
Bolton has said, "If I were redoing the Security Council today, I'd have one permanent member because that's the real reflection of the distribution of power in the world."4 And: "There is no such thing as the United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power left in the world and that is the United States, when it suits our interests and we can get others to go along." 5

Q: Have you ever made false claims about a country possessing weapons of mass destruction?
In May 2002, Bolton claimed without any evidence that Cuba possessed "at least a limited offensive biological warfare research development effort," and that Cuba had provided this technology to "other rogue states." 6 Secretary of State Powell and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld quickly disavowed the claim for lack of evidence. In 2003, Bolton intended to testify before Congress about a Syrian WMD program. His testimony was suddenly rescheduled because the CIA and the State Department could find no evidence of this claim.

Q: The International Criminal Court (ICC) is recognized around the world as a crucial instrument for pursuing international justice for grave human rights abuses, such as genocide. Yet you have always been vocally opposed to the Court. Why?
Bolton has characterized the ICC as "dangerous"7 because it would have jurisdiction to try US citizens accused of severe human rights abuses. Bolton led the fight within the Bush Administration that resulted in the unprecedented decision to renounce the treaty upholding US participation in the ICC. Bolton called Bush’s withdrawal from the treaty “the happiest moment of my government service.” 8

Q: It is widely acknowledged that the UN has done more than any single government or international agency to promote global development, fight poverty, and stem the spread of AIDS and other preventable diseases. As the world’s richest country, what role do you think the US should play in these efforts?
Although the US gives proportionately less development aid that any other industrialized country, Bolton has advocated halting the US contribution to the UN altogether, stating that, "nothing more should be paid to the UN system."9 Bolton has been a major proponent of economic policies skewed to benefit multinational corporations—particularly US arms manufacturers and oil companies—and a staunch critic of development strategies that aim to meet the basic needs of people in the most impoverished countries.

Q: Do you concur with the UN Charter that “promoting and encouraging respect for human rights” is a fundamental priority of our time?
Bolton has referred to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Millennium Declaration, which offers a human rights blueprint for ending global poverty, as "mind-numbing."10

Q: Do you believe that citizens should be prevented from having a voice at the United Nations, even when the UN is formulating policy that has a direct impact on their lives?
Bolton has said, "We do not support the promotion of international advocacy activity by international or non-governmental organizations, particularly when those political or policy views advocated are not consistent with the views of all member states."11

Q: You have been called confrontational, ruthless, dogmatic, and the “anti-diplomat.” Why do you think people say these things about you?
Bolton has asserted that US diplomacy towards North Korea should be based on "making it clear to the North that we are indifferent to whether we ever have 'normal' diplomatic relations with it."12 When asked about taking a carrot-and-stick approach to Iran, Bolton’s response was, "I don't do carrots." 13 Bolton called for the CIA to spy on Hans Blix after the chief UN weapons inspector did not find weapons in Iraq. More recently, Bolton has been trying to fire Mohamed ElBaradei, the highly-respected chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, for not finding nuclear weapons in Iran.

While the UN is hardly a perfect institution, it is the only world body in which all countries can work together to solve international problems and the only truly global organization dedicated to promoting peace and development. Public opinion polls consistently show that the majority of people in the US overwhelmingly support the United Nations and constructive US participation in the organization. John Bolton is an extremist who has made a career of undermining the United Nations and the principle of international cooperation.

Take Action! Contact your Senators and urge them not to confirm Bolton as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations.


<link> http://madre.org/articles/int/bolton.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. The UN was right
I didn't hear this question:

'Mr. Bolton, you intimidated analysts who disagreed with various WMD analyses. You dismissed the UN and say it should support US policies. The UN was right on Iraq when it desired a longer inspections process. Mr. Bolton, how do you reconcile your attacks on the UN with the fact that they were right on Iraq?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I belived Russ Feingold asked this
or close.

But it was asked.

Notlob tried dancing and weaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Good
I'll try and find a transcript and check for an exact quote. Because that seemed like it should be the central theme. He intimidates people who disagree with him on intelligence, dismisses the international community on Iraq; but it turns out he wasn't right on either of them. So why does he get the job again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I also heard the question asked
but I'm not positive by who. I watched Biden, Kerry, Boxer and Obama, and a little of one other Dem (San something - don't think it was him). I'm thinking it was Obama, but I'm not positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. He looks crazy
Edited on Mon Apr-11-05 04:54 PM by politicasista
:kick: the thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nominate this thread
Thanks PITA!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Link to Kerry's Bolton Ad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. See? JFK can be funny, even when things are serious.
"...there are several." Effective, yet cynically humorous. Thank you, Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Also,
watch his face and mannerisms as he questions Bolton. He really despises this guy--they go back 20 years, all the way to Iran-Contra. Bolton protected Reagan from some of what Kerry uncovered.

Kerry's usually pretty cool when he interrogates, but he's showing more disgust with this guy than with Rice or Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. I like everything except the phrase "intelligence failures"
In reality, Bush and the media was just plain lying about it. Kerry is backing up the GOP/media line that the WMD propaganda was the CIA's fault. I'd rather him be more blunt and truthful about that.

Other than that, pretty good- except it is only on his web site and not on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. On TV in RI I think. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Have any Rhode Island DU'ers seen the ad?
The only RI TV station I receive is PBS.

HELLO?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. This was in the Boston Globe site:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/04/11/kerry_ads_target_ri_sen_lincoln_chafee/

Democrats opposing Bolton's nomination have expressed concerns about his diplomatic temperament, and previous statements he made criticizing the U.N.

Asked about Kerry's ad campaign Chafee said, "That's just the politics of this issue."

The approximately $20,000 in Web-based ads were running Monday and Tuesday on a variety of newspaper sites. They were also delivered by e-mail to about 170,000 Kerry supporters in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut, and about 800,000 individuals across the country who signed Kerry's Internet petition calling on Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign.

Kerry's political campaign committee paid for the ads, which largely targeted Internet users in Rhode Island. The ad asks people to call Chafee and urge him to resist White House pressure to back Bolton's nomination.


And this from the NYTimes:http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/12/politics/12chafee.html

The White House is pressing Mr. Chafee, a moderate who is often at odds with his party, to vote in favor. His constituents in heavily Democratic Rhode Island, where he may face a tough re-election fight next year, are urging him to vote against - prodded in part by Senator John Kerry of nearby Massachusetts.

On Monday, Mr. Kerry sent an e-mail message urging his supporters to call Mr. Chafee. Mr. Chafee's offices in Providence and Washington have been flooded with phone calls as a result.

"It's an important vote," Mr. Chafee said Monday. "But I'll be honest. Back in Rhode Island, I think the interest groups care strongly about it, but I think the average citizen doesn't know who John Bolton is."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I signed his petitions...
...and will contuinue to help out the Shadow Prez as much as I can- I'm supporting Clark for 2008 though.


Kerry is doing pretty good- I want to see more of this kind of action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. No he isn't
This is what he said in the hearing yesterday. He is not accepting that it's just a CIA problem at all.

"We've just come off the most massive intelligence failure in our history, and we recognize that there are serious questions still outstanding about the degree to which that intelligence was manipulated or the degree to which a predetermined position to determine the outcome of that intelligence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Excellent- He should use that phrase everytime instead.
He needs to be sure to say "mainpulated intelligence" instead of "intelligence failures."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC