Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Family Research Council's "Justice Sunday": HYPOCRISY REVEALED!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:16 AM
Original message
Family Research Council's "Justice Sunday": HYPOCRISY REVEALED!
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 10:23 AM by Roland99
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/010459.html

When it suited its own purposes, the Family Research Council had no trouble urging use of the filibuster. People for the American Way (PFAW) reports (received by e-mail):

The Family Research Council is demanding that Senate Republicans override Senate rules in order to ban filibusters against judicial nominees – and has made false and inflammatory charges that the filibuster is being used to keep people of faith – and specifically Christians – off the courts. But several years ago, a senior Family Research Council official defended a Senate filibuster against gay ambassadorial nominee James Hormel, who was viciously attacked by radical right groups.



PFAW writes that in 1998, then-Senior FRC Writer and Analyst Steven Schwalm, appearedg on NPR’s Talk of the Nation and had this to say about the filibuster against James Hormel, President’s Clinton’s ambassadorial nominee:

...the Senate is a -- is not a majoritarian institution like the House of Representatives is. It is a deliberative body and it's got a number of checks and balances built into our government. This is one of those checks, in which a majority cannot just sheerly force its will, even if they have a majority of votes in some cases, that's why there are things like filibusters and other things that give minorities in the Senate some power to slow things up, to hold things up, and let things be aired properly.




I just forwarded this information to Sens. McConnell and Frist.

I suggest you all do the same! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's only a good thing
when our side is doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. they loved the filibuster when they were the minority
now, in the majority, they want to be able to run roughshod over whomever gets in the their ideological way . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's my email to Frist (the cat killer)
Senator Frist,
It never ceases to amaze me how hypocritical extremists are that pose as Christians. The people you are aligning yourself with are not Christians. They are extremists... no better than Muslim extremists posing as Muslims.

Here is a perfect example of their hypocrisy. You and your party will be defeated in 2006 and it will be directly related to all of your party's corruption and power-mad and arrogant actions.

When it suited its own purposes, the Family Research Council had no trouble urging use of the filibuster. People for the American Way (PFAW) reports (received by e-mail):

The Family Research Council is demanding that Senate Republicans override Senate rules in order to ban filibusters against judicial nominees and has made false and inflammatory charges that the filibuster is being used to keep people of faith and specifically Christians off the courts. But several years ago, a senior Family Research Council official defended a Senate filibuster against gay ambassadorial nominee James Hormel, who was viciously attacked by radical right groups.

PFAW writes that in 1998, then-Senior FRC Writer and Analyst Steven Schwalm, appearedg on NPRs Talk of the Nation and had this to say about the filibuster against James Hormel, President Clinton's ambassadorial nominee:

...the Senate is a -- is not a majoritarian institution like the House of Representatives is. It is a deliberative body and it's got a number of checks and balances built into our government. This is one of those checks, in which a majority cannot just sheerly force its will, even if they have a majority of votes in some cases, that's why there are things like filibusters and other things that give minorities in the Senate some power to slow things up, to hold things up, and let things be aired properly.

I look forward to seeing you as a part of the minority soon and we'll see how often you choose to filibuster. Hypocrite. Cat Killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bravo! Keep 'em coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC