Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My letter to the editor published today re: Arctic Refuge/fuel efficiency.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:15 PM
Original message
My letter to the editor published today re: Arctic Refuge/fuel efficiency.
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 07:16 PM by Clarkie1
I'm really beginning to enjoy writing letters to the editor of our local paper. Especially since I'm getting every letter I write published so far (2 for 2). Knock on wood.

Pombo is Chair of the House Natural Resources committee and this district was one of the "Dean Dozen" last year. I think our chances will be even better next year to unseat him.

I thought others might be able to get ideas from it to write their own letter. I think the hypocrisy of voting to drill in the Arctic Refuge while voting down increasing fuel efficiency standards is pretty hypocritical if the goal is to reduce dependence on foreign oil. Here is a link to representatives who voted down raising fuel efficiency standarards...it's pathetic 60 of them are dems, and the ammendment was authored by a Republican.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll121.xml

Here is the text of my letter:

Dear Editor,

I am a teacher. Today the student council at the school where I work led the school in a flag ceremony in recognition of Earth Day. We teach our children to reduce, reuse, and recycle. We teach that it is patriotic to do so. Yet Richard Pombo, our representative in congress, does not seem to understand our values or our children’s values.

Richard Pombo and the Republican leadership have passed an Energy bill that allows oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife refuge. The oil won't be available for a decade and even then at levels that will not significantly affect oil prices or imports. Yet, Pombo and the Republicans argue that even this small amount of oil is more important the environmental consequences. They argue that we must lessen our dependence upon foreign oil, even at the cost of the wildlife refuge.

Yet, if Pombo truly voted for the drilling because he values lessening our country’s dependence on foreign oil, why did not also vote for an amendment sponsored by fellow Republican Sherwood Boehlert of New York which would have reduced oil use by 2 million barrels a day (more oil than could be taken from the refuge by 2020) by simply raising fuel efficiency standards for auto manufacturers? 36 Republicans courageously broke with their party to vote for raising the fuel efficiency standards, but Pombo voted no. The ammendment failed.

Apparently, Pombo is more interested in rewarding big oil companies than he is in lessening our dependence on foreign oil or protecting our most treasured wilderness areas.

That’s a horrible example for our children. It’s also something to remember the next time Pombo claims he is a “moderate Republican.”








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way to go!
An enviable success rate too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm pleasantly suprised, considering the paper endorsed Pombo last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. A great letter and great to know it will be published!
Keep on writing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. ANWR oil and gas will only be sold in the US right ? If not we just
made Alaskans rich and blew about a years worth of oil/gas...for foreign consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC