Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FRI. OFFICIAL CSPAN2 Thread on Senate Judicial Noms & Filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dhuss Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:35 AM
Original message
FRI. OFFICIAL CSPAN2 Thread on Senate Judicial Noms & Filibuster
Edited on Fri May-20-05 08:37 AM by dhuss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mornin' dhuss!
Edited on Fri May-20-05 08:39 AM by indy_azcat
Thanks for doing these threads!

:toast:

On edit:
Holy crap, that's 200!

yay!

:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhuss Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. no problem...
I won't be around to much today, I have some work I REALLY need to finish.

If it makes you feel any better I totally missed my 100th... (starting this thread was my 101 :party: )

D.H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. keep on an eye on the Lounge for Newyawkers MILESTONES
post to see yer name in lights then. Congrats!


:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Happy Friday! Here....we.....go....! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. thanks--i will have to tune in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. and here is Kerry speech from yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for running these! Since I can't stream at work, the
play-by-plays are very helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. some Repug saying that Brown not an extreemist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. repug obviously do not like Deparate Housewifes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. strong willed women?
not liked by the repugs?

Having... S E X?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Hil. is a strong willed women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. saying we are built on fundamental foundations of right and wrong
We are by human nature-good people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Saying that We have a debased debauched society
and Rodgers Brown was right: Says that the shift from "Father Knows Best" to "Desperate Housewives" on TV is proof that she was right all along and we're all sinners.

Oi. Those sinners elected you (lord knows why, though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who is this idiot going on and on about single moms
not having lobbyists (addressing something Owens is supposed to have said)? If these jersk are aware that single moms with concerns exist out there, why do they only way the concerns of paid lobbyists. This is just getting on my nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Does anyone know who is going to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhuss Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. no, not really. but I hope our speeches are as good as yesterday n/t
D.H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Media Circus Coming to Town
Apparently, Sean "Baby Jesus" Hannity is coming to DC to broadcast live starting on Tuesday. I'm sure this is arranged somehow with the RNC, so my guess is the actual "Nuke" option will be Tuesday or Wednesday.

And he has the nerve to call lawyers "ambulance chasers"

What an Attention Whore.

Say Goodbye to Democracy. How long until they declare Martial Law? Anyone think if the Dem's walk-out, Frist will have them arrested.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. According to Congressional Quarterly,
Frist will call for a cloture vote today and the vote will be scheduled for Tuesday the 24th. The button will be pushed "later the same day" according to CQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. sad day it will be--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. so these judges are ambulance chases n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. No
Edited on Fri May-20-05 10:00 AM by maxrandb
Sean Insanity is an "ambulance chaser".

Did you see how quickly he pitched his tent down there in Pinelas Park, FL.

Guess he wants a "ring-side" seat to the destruction of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Dodd: You need to be in the minority
before you can understand minority rights in the Senate.

In other words, "You folks don't know whatchoo talkin' about! Come back in 20 years!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. Dodd talking to younger Senators
You will only have a few moments when you look back on your career that you will truly have made a difference... it'll be when you removed yourself from the passions of the day and done the right thing.

You won't remember these people in 10 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. filly meant to check an aggressive executive branch-YUP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. lots of talk of checks and balances from Dodd--oh i do hope the people
wake up and see what is happening--how our government has so little checks and balances the last few years!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. This discussion is good for our country--but sure hope for a positive
outcome (for the Dems)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. says chief threat to the judicary is the President (from our
Edited on Fri May-20-05 09:27 AM by rodeodance
founding fathers)--they feared this cause the Pres.already has the right to nominate--but need check from Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. Phrases I never want to hear again (from both sides)
Edited on Fri May-20-05 09:26 AM by The Witch
"consitutional option"
"up-or-down vote"
"the senate has the right to change its own rules"
"break the rules in order to change the rules"
"minority rights"
"rubber stamp"
"out of the mainstream"
"litmus test"
ETA: "advice and consent"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. yes, i agree--esp.. the 'upanddownvote'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. now speaking to those who have only served under a Repug
president--says the day will come when you will serve inder a Democrat--and need to be carefull--very carefull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. says if you ceed power to the executive branch you will never
get it back!!--so so right on!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
31. Cornhole Cornryn up now
:argh:

I can't bring myself to use the puke smiley...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I can't believe this guy was a judge once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. ugh...
shut up already! I am soooo ready to stick my fingers in my ears and start chanting "nya, nya, nya ... I can't HEAR you!" Seriously though, he is totally obnoxious to listen to. Even in the background, while trying to tune him out and read other threads, he STILL annoys the heck out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. We should do it because the papers say so!
Where's the liberal media now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Dean said it well:
"I am tired of being lectured to about moral values by a corrupt party"

Typical airs of a white man of the Texas ruling class.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
37. Carl Levin (D-Mich) up..
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. He says..
for more than a century, required unanimous consent to cut off debate. Then in 1917 went to 2/3...

History lesson - calmly given. Senate as deliberative body. How to change our rules is based on groundrules, process, that should be defended by all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
38. The speeches by Dems are so statesmanlike
good for the history books, and hopefully
for the continuity of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. no rules of the Senate
should be left up to the whim of any Senate Majority leader."

Like the way he keeps using the word "fiat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. yeah, except I keep thinking of the car...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
40. Nuclear option could be used to arbitrarily change any rule.
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Seek to fit the rules to the occasion...
rather than the occasion to the rules." He was quoting Senator Vandenberg (sp?), but it was a good line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. More from vandenberg
The rules of the Senate as they exist at any given time...should not be changed substantively by the interpretive action of the Senate's presiding officer...only by the direct and conscious sanction by the senate itself, acting within the rules, or else the rules are not worth the paper they're written on..."

Dang - can't type fast enough - great speech, great quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. "...otherwise all the rules of the Senate aren't worth the paper
they are written on"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
46. Levin's speech text
Edited on Fri May-20-05 10:26 AM by indy_azcat
Hee hee, calls Cheney a dictator... I like it!

See it all at:

http://levin.senate.gov/newsroom/release.cfm?id=237992
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:30 AM
Original message
Arlen Specter up
Has he said he won't vote for the option? So far he is sounding like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
47. Specter Up
Hmmmm... which way will it blow?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Says both parties should concede publicly that both are at fault
but says Dems are doing this as payback....
He's really pushing for compromise it seems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
48. Single bullet theory Specter up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
49. Specter up now...
warning of "nuclear explosion' that may end the Senate as we know it, and how we can't expect Jimmy Stewart to ride in and save teh day..

Nice touch...

Asking to liberate caucuses to vote without party straightjackets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Did he just say Dems wanted to fillibuster for revenge
after Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Yup, now he's using "unprecedented"
... repub talking points ... but says bush was unprecedented with interim appointments. Sounds like he wants to wash his hands of the whole deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. After they already gave him the majority of picks?
How conenient that he overlook that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #57
62. lLike the way he is giving potentially bad judges a pass? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. Leaders should release members...
What about other interests that might be influencing politicians.

Like $$$$$$$$$ interests that might prefer the reactionary views of some candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. Sounds like Specter is trying to have it both ways. He really thinks
Edited on Fri May-20-05 10:42 AM by yellowcanine
limiting debate using the nuclear option is a bad idea but he doesn't want to piss off the wingnuts by saying that. Maybe he will vote "not proven".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. both sides behaved badly starting under Reagan
True there have been filibusters, but not a PATTERN of filibusters (as now). Angry recriminations, each party trying to get even, or really, to dominate.

Obvious issue does not involve qualifications of nominees, because of offers and counter-offers of votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
52. Wow
- in '94 we republicans won the senate majority, we EXACERBATED the nomination delays - didn't expect that from a repub.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 AM
Original message
Got to agree with him on this...
that if any one of them are really so unqualified, making deals that would confirm them is "repugnant".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. Interesting arguement - if you don't want them, and broker a deal
then you are breaking your oath.

Asking for leaders to release from straightjacket of partyline voting, he keeps hit it - he's begging for a release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. good line...
though on the conscience..

he says that the dominant party is strictly voting party line, and he does not think that's appropriate when it's a matter of a rule change that so much affects the minority.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. He just outlined "The Deal"
Edited on Fri May-20-05 10:39 AM by indy_azcat
1 or 2 of the 3 'to be filibustered' judges (to be dem picked) will go thru and no filibuster.

Judges being Owens, Brown, or Pryor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. PIck your poison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
56. Saying Democrats are repugnant
for offering to confirm 1 of 7 or whatever! EXCUSE ME! We're offering to VOTE on them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
63. WHOA
Just said "If it has to do with rules affecting minority rights, the deciding factor should not be party lines." He might just be OK... saying that the nuclear option will hurt Senate much more than these judges will hurt law...

Now pointing out that these judges are sworn in their job description not to be activist and that their judgments are subject to correction...

:scared: Now talking about Supreme Court :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhuss Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
64. Hi Sen Specter
:hi:

D.H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
65. says a group of 12
should not decide who gets confirmed and who does not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
66. lambasting pro-nuclear option commercials
Interesting angle - "save the republic"

not clear how to do that based on the debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
67. Blasting outside groups
and ads on both sides. "The issue ought to be returned to Senate." Says Dems should say we won't filibuster and Repubs shouldn't pull the trigger. Somehow I'm actually OK with this at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. but it'll only work
if republicans actually 'vote their conscience' on the nominees - e.g. there's a 'hope' that bad nominees would actually NOT be confirmed by a simple vote.

Like that'll happen.

So we're back to the filibuster as the only tool of the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
70. Just tied it into the Bolton nomination
Hey, we were supposed to be distracted from that with the underpants and all that jazz....

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
71. Jim Jeffords (I-Vermont) up...
and not liking the "nuclear option"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
72. Next: Jimmy Jeffords - VT
Edited on Fri May-20-05 10:58 AM by indy_azcat
Started off "cautioning against Nuclear option"

ETA: Do Independents get a full hour during the debates too?

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. blames administration for
lack of consultation and just wanting to win or resubmit. 95% is pretty good. Checks and balances now. He's running down the democratic points pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. That point about resubmitting
Edited on Fri May-20-05 11:01 AM by CWebster
underlines their determination to have it their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:03 AM
Original message
will be a new majority leader in Jan 2007
who, Repub. or Democrat, will not be bound by the promises made now.

Good point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBeans Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
73. interesting...
I think Specter is parroting some of the Republican talking points in order to placate the far right. He's being plenty critical of the nuclear option.

I think the most important part of that is his repeated plea for Frist to allow Republican senators to vote their conscience. The pressure on them must be brutal.

Specter looks like a dying man. Maybe he wants to have curbing the radical right as his final legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #73
76. Yeah, everytime he speaks, he asks Frist to release
I hope he votes his conscience, I think he'll vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justsomegirl Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
77. Jeffords:
I refuse to be a rubber stamp in my last 14 months of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
78. Refuse to rubberstamp...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
79. I refuse to spend my last 19 months in the senate
being a rubber stamp for Bush.

Go Jeffords Go.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
80. Dayton. He should be good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
81. Dayton (D-Minn.) now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
82. Parlimentarian
we don't need no stinkin' Parlimentarian?

hee hee, nice one dayton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. he's doing great...
so will they propose up or down vote to all executive nominations? Noooooo...only judicial.

So will they apply to all judicial nominations? Noooo....

So how can they contend the constitution requires this? Where does Constitution permit senate leadership or one senator to make the distinction between one judicial nominee or another, or between judicial and other nominees covered within that section of the Constitution?

Cannot apply one definition (and one set of senate rules) to one set of nominees, and another to another.

Excellent points...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
83. upperdown
Edited on Fri May-20-05 11:18 AM by indy_azcat
ETA:
^ What A in A said up thar
|



Notes hypocrisy of limiting up or down to only judicial noms - says if it goes nuclear then it should apply for EVERYTHING (emphasizing the magnitude of this debate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
85. blanchie lincoln - AR
JINX to the next one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. LOL!
Waited for you this time! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indy_azcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. you can have next
Lunch time

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #85
88. If my child came home with a 95% on a paper, I wouldn't stamp my
feet and yell that it wasn't good enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. speaking with passion..
this is more important than party.

when will it stop? will this happen next week or next year on Soc. Security?

Let's all take time to think about what nuclear fallout is all about.

Members on both sides considering a short-term compromise for the remainder of this session. Hopeful it can be achieved. Regretful that current political environment has put us in this situation at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #90
93. yes, the human cost is what she is talking of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBeans Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
89. hmmm
This is the first time I've been impressed by Lincoln. I'll have to remember this moment the next time I throw my hands up and call for the head of a dino - on occasion they come through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
91. She's doin' okay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. Sen. Lincoln Dem AK is doing a great articulate job -she comes
across well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #92
94. Lamar Alexander is a bore!! what a whinner!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhuss Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
95. NEW THREAD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC