Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Urban League blasts "The Filibuster Fig Leaf"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-05 11:12 PM
Original message
National Urban League blasts "The Filibuster Fig Leaf"
The Filibuster Fig Leaf

by Marc Morial, President, National Urban League

Proponents pushing the current effort to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster for judicial nominations in the Senate have sought to cloak their claims with references to the historic civil rights struggles of the 1950s and 1960s. But, as the president and CEO of the National Urban League, one of the nation’s oldest and most respected civil rights organizations, I say to America: Don’t believe the hype!

The filibuster, despite its checkered past, was and remains an important tool to protect the rights of the minority party, whether Democratic or Republican—and it’s one of the things that make the Senate the greatest deliberative body in the world. Yes, the filibuster was used to temporarily thwart civil rights legislation—as when Sen. Strom Thurmond staged the longest filibuster in Senate history in 1957.

But that obstructionism was overcome by the bipartisan effort to ensure that all Americans should enjoy full rights of citizenship. When the Senate’s rules made achieving the goals of the civil rights movement tougher, civil rights advocates didn’t propose throwing out the rules to get their way. They just worked harder with Senate giants like Everett Dirksen, the Illinois Republican, and Lyndon Johnson, the Texas Democrat, to win the old fashioned way: by earning it honestly.

How many of the Senators who now claim that the “nuclear option” is a blow for civil rights demanded an up-or-down vote on the 2004 Fairness Act, one of the most important pieces of civil rights legislation in years? The Fairness Act—which would have guaranteed equal access to publicly-funded services, protection for older workers, remedies for on-the-job discrimination, and equal pay for women in the workforce—languished and eventually died in the Senate, the victim of the leadership’s failure to allow a vote. And now, some seek to discard a time-tested Senate tradition and principle of democracy in order to promote judges with a proven hostility toward civil rights.


<snip>
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050520/the_filibuster_fig_leaf.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC